The Impact of US-China Trade War on China’s Exports: Evidence From Difference-in-Differences Model

This study examines the impact of the US-China trade war on Chinese exports. Using the monthly export data from January 2017 to October 2022 with a Difference-in-Differences (DID) model, our findings show: First, before the trade war, export trends in China and the control group (the EU, South Korea, Japan, ASEAN, and India) were similar. Second, the trade war dramatically reduced China’s exports to the US, with tariff rises cited as the principal cause. Third, the robustness of our finding was established using a placebo test with 500 random samples. Our policy recommendations include leveraging multilateral negotiation mechanisms, accelerating industrial upgrading, and optimizing trade strategies to address the root causes of trade frictions effectively. JEL Classification: F13, F14, F62.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251328482
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of US-China Trade War on China’s Exports: Evidence From Difference-in-Differences Model

Wee‐Yeap Lau, Elya Nabila Abdul Bahri, Ting Yang
11 citations
SAGE Open
Global trade and economics
33.94
article

The Impact of US-China Trade War on China’s Exports: Evidence From Difference-in-Differences Model

Wee‐Yeap Lau, Elya Nabila Abdul Bahri, Ting Yang
article en
11 citations

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the US-China trade war on Chinese exports. Using the monthly export data from January 2017 to October 2022 with a Difference-in-Differences (DID) model, our findings show: First, before the trade war, export trends in China and the control group (the EU, South Korea, Japan, ASEAN, and India) were similar. Second, the trade war dramatically reduced China’s exports to the US, with tariff rises cited as the principal cause. Third, the robustness of our finding was established using a placebo test with 500 random samples. Our policy recommendations include leveraging multilateral negotiation mechanisms, accelerating industrial upgrading, and optimizing trade strategies to address the root causes of trade frictions effectively. JEL Classification: F13, F14, F62.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(2)
University of Malaya (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Global trade and economics
33.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.