Improved method for sample mixing, handling and analysis in high water cut samples

Operating production facilites in mature fields globally pose both measurement challenges and opportunities. When production depletes, facility operations may transition from three-phase to two-phase production separation resulting in allocation measurement of oil and water mixtures. There are two common approaches used for production allocation measurement to determine water cut: online water cut analyzers (WCA) and sampling.Sampling can be spot or automatic, with automatic sampling preferred for custody applications when water content is less than 5 % by volume. Spot sampling is the common method used for field verifying WCA. The most common technique for determining water content in a sample is by centrifuge; however, the centrifuge methods lack published reproducibility and repeatability data at high water cuts (>5 % water in oil by volume). Sample handling and mixing with high water concentrations are also a severe challenge, especially with light oils and products which don't mix well. As WCAs are used more and more in high water cut production allocation, an accurate methodology for verifying the instruments is required for broad industry acceptance but the current industry guidance is very limited. This paper describes an improved method for sample handling, and mixing and describes the proof of concept of using existing methods for analysis of high water cut samples for production allocation measurement developed in support of WCA verification. The testing described in this paper used water cuts 15–95 % by volume, and three hydrocarbons: two crudes and one distillate oil. The data demonstrates the range of the standard methods (API 10.3 and API 10.4) could be expanded while meeting or exceeding the current reproducibility requirements of API MPMS Ch 8 and Ch 10.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2025.102912
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Flow Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved method for sample mixing, handling and analysis in high water cut samples

Paul Chacon, Richard Guilbeau, Gary Potten, James Strawn
1 citations
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
Flow Measurement and Analysis
0.86
article

Improved method for sample mixing, handling and analysis in high water cut samples

Paul Chacon, Richard Guilbeau, Gary Potten, James Strawn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Operating production facilites in mature fields globally pose both measurement challenges and opportunities. When production depletes, facility operations may transition from three-phase to two-phase production separation resulting in allocation measurement of oil and water mixtures. There are two common approaches used for production allocation measurement to determine water cut: online water cut analyzers (WCA) and sampling.Sampling can be spot or automatic, with automatic sampling preferred for custody applications when water content is less than 5 % by volume. Spot sampling is the common method used for field verifying WCA. The most common technique for determining water content in a sample is by centrifuge; however, the centrifuge methods lack published reproducibility and repeatability data at high water cuts (>5 % water in oil by volume). Sample handling and mixing with high water concentrations are also a severe challenge, especially with light oils and products which don't mix well. As WCAs are used more and more in high water cut production allocation, an accurate methodology for verifying the instruments is required for broad industry acceptance but the current industry guidance is very limited. This paper describes an improved method for sample handling, and mixing and describes the proof of concept of using existing methods for analysis of high water cut samples for production allocation measurement developed in support of WCA verification. The testing described in this paper used water cuts 15–95 % by volume, and three hydrocarbons: two crudes and one distillate oil. The data demonstrates the range of the standard methods (API 10.3 and API 10.4) could be expanded while meeting or exceeding the current reproducibility requirements of API MPMS Ch 8 and Ch 10.

Flow Measurement and InstrumentationVol. 104
Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group (US), Chevron (United States) (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Flow Measurement and Analysis
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.