Systematic review of autistic representation in the treatment literature for pediatric chronic pain

Chronic pain disproportionately affects autistic children and young people, yet they are underrepresented in pain research. Research on psychological, physical, and pharmacological therapies for other conditions suggests modifications are required to ensure treatment accessibility and efficacy for autistic individuals. However, no such evidence base has been synthesized in pediatric pain. The aim of this review was to (1) review existing "gold-standard" treatment literature for pediatric chronic pain to determine the representation of autistic participants, and (2) review literature on treatment of chronic pain specifically in autistic children and young people to describe the current evidence landscape and identify next directions for research. 16.7% (12/72) of randomized controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews of interventions for pediatric chronic pain explicitly excluded youth with a developmental delay/disability, of which only 8.3% specifically named autism. However, 52.8% of Cochrane-included trials had criteria or protocols which may have disproportionately impacted autistic participants, such as excluding intellectual disability, psychiatric conditions, medical conditions, and/or requiring participants to communicate verbally. Twenty-nine studies of treating chronic pain in autistic children and young people were identified, of which the majority were case reports (k = 27, 93%) with large variation in pain condition, intervention applied, and outcomes measured. Given the high prevalence of chronic pain in autistic children and young people, there is an ethical imperative to ensure their representation in intervention trials, co-develop interventions that address the specific needs of autistic individuals who live with pediatric chronic pain, and to increase accessibility in chronic pain research more broadly. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=491423 registered March 19 2024. Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/8na64/ registered December 18, 2023 PERSPECTIVE: Autistic children and young people (CYP) are not represented in reviews of chronic pain treatments, and the literature on treating chronic pain specifically in this population is so variable no clear conclusions can be drawn. Efforts to increase accessibility of chronic pain interventions and research for autistic CYP is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pain
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105390
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review of autistic representation in the treatment literature for pediatric chronic pain

Colleen Pawliuk, Katelynn E. Boerner, David Moore, Tim F. Oberlander et al.
3 citations
Journal of Pain
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
10.48
article

Systematic review of autistic representation in the treatment literature for pediatric chronic pain

Colleen Pawliuk, Katelynn E. Boerner, David Moore, Tim F. Oberlander, Hemakumar Devan, Kai Leong, Aishwarya Heran, Bethany Donaghy
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Chronic pain disproportionately affects autistic children and young people, yet they are underrepresented in pain research. Research on psychological, physical, and pharmacological therapies for other conditions suggests modifications are required to ensure treatment accessibility and efficacy for autistic individuals. However, no such evidence base has been synthesized in pediatric pain. The aim of this review was to (1) review existing "gold-standard" treatment literature for pediatric chronic pain to determine the representation of autistic participants, and (2) review literature on treatment of chronic pain specifically in autistic children and young people to describe the current evidence landscape and identify next directions for research. 16.7% (12/72) of randomized controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews of interventions for pediatric chronic pain explicitly excluded youth with a developmental delay/disability, of which only 8.3% specifically named autism. However, 52.8% of Cochrane-included trials had criteria or protocols which may have disproportionately impacted autistic participants, such as excluding intellectual disability, psychiatric conditions, medical conditions, and/or requiring participants to communicate verbally. Twenty-nine studies of treating chronic pain in autistic children and young people were identified, of which the majority were case reports (k = 27, 93%) with large variation in pain condition, intervention applied, and outcomes measured. Given the high prevalence of chronic pain in autistic children and young people, there is an ethical imperative to ensure their representation in intervention trials, co-develop interventions that address the specific needs of autistic individuals who live with pediatric chronic pain, and to increase accessibility in chronic pain research more broadly. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=491423 registered March 19 2024. Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/8na64/ registered December 18, 2023 PERSPECTIVE: Autistic children and young people (CYP) are not represented in reviews of chronic pain treatments, and the literature on treating chronic pain specifically in this population is so variable no clear conclusions can be drawn. Efforts to increase accessibility of chronic pain interventions and research for autistic CYP is needed.

Journal of PainVol. 37
Women's Health Research Institute (CA), BC Children's Hospital (CA), B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre (CA), Liverpool John Moores University (GB), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
10.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.