The acceptability of the Good Spirit, Good Life framework for remote-living Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples

The Good Spirit, Good Life (GSGL) framework is a culturally informed quality of life (QoL) model co-designed with and for older Aboriginal people in Australia. The framework comprises twelve domains: family and friends, Country, community, culture, health, respect, safety and security, supports and services, Elder role, spirituality, future planning, and basic needs. The framework has been validated for urban and regional-living older Aboriginal people. It is unknown if the framework is valid in remote-living Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations. This study aimed to determine the acceptability of the GSGL framework for older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living in remote areas and explore how the GSGL factors contribute to the QoL of this population. A qualitative co-design study was conducted in five communities in the remote Kimberley and Torres Strait regions of Australia. Eight yarning groups comprising 36 people explored participants’ views about the framework. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. All participants agreed that the GSGL framework broadly reflected the Indigenous conception of what it means for older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to have a good life. Participants in the Torres Strait felt that the connection to Country domain did match in conceptualisation, although the term Island Home was preferred. Participants in the Kimberley region reported that no changes were required. The GSGL framework, with a minor adjustment to include Torres Strait Islander perspectives, has been found to reflect the quality of life needs of older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in urban, regional, and remote areas. The GSGL framework can be applied to inform planning and delivery of health and aged care to support the culturally informed quality of life needs of older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples Australia-wide. • The Good Spirit, Good Life framework captures the QoL views of older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in remote Australia. • No change to the Good Spirit Good Life framework was required for remote living Aboriginal people. • Island Home encompasses Torres Strait Islander peoples' perspectives of Country. • The Good Spirit Good Life domain of ‘Country’ now additionally includes ‘Island Home’ (Country/Island Home).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Mental Health
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100443
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The acceptability of the Good Spirit, Good Life framework for remote-living Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples

Edward Strivens, Chenoa Wapau, Rachel Quigley, Roslyn Malay et al.
4 citations
SSM - Mental Health
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
8.67
article

The acceptability of the Good Spirit, Good Life framework for remote-living Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples

Edward Strivens, Chenoa Wapau, Rachel Quigley, Roslyn Malay, Kate Smith, Zoë Hyde, Carl White, Leon Flicker, Dawn C Bessarab, Betty Sagigi, Sarah Russell, Lianne Gilchrist, Caleb Rivers, Esther Chaney, Laurie Yambo
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The Good Spirit, Good Life (GSGL) framework is a culturally informed quality of life (QoL) model co-designed with and for older Aboriginal people in Australia. The framework comprises twelve domains: family and friends, Country, community, culture, health, respect, safety and security, supports and services, Elder role, spirituality, future planning, and basic needs. The framework has been validated for urban and regional-living older Aboriginal people. It is unknown if the framework is valid in remote-living Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations. This study aimed to determine the acceptability of the GSGL framework for older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living in remote areas and explore how the GSGL factors contribute to the QoL of this population. A qualitative co-design study was conducted in five communities in the remote Kimberley and Torres Strait regions of Australia. Eight yarning groups comprising 36 people explored participants’ views about the framework. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. All participants agreed that the GSGL framework broadly reflected the Indigenous conception of what it means for older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to have a good life. Participants in the Torres Strait felt that the connection to Country domain did match in conceptualisation, although the term Island Home was preferred. Participants in the Kimberley region reported that no changes were required. The GSGL framework, with a minor adjustment to include Torres Strait Islander perspectives, has been found to reflect the quality of life needs of older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in urban, regional, and remote areas. The GSGL framework can be applied to inform planning and delivery of health and aged care to support the culturally informed quality of life needs of older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples Australia-wide. • The Good Spirit, Good Life framework captures the QoL views of older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in remote Australia. • No change to the Good Spirit Good Life framework was required for remote living Aboriginal people. • Island Home encompasses Torres Strait Islander peoples' perspectives of Country. • The Good Spirit Good Life domain of ‘Country’ now additionally includes ‘Island Home’ (Country/Island Home).

SSM - Mental HealthVol. 7
Queensland Health (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Cairns Hospital (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
8.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.