Model Predictive Control for Rotary Inverted Pendulum: Simulation and Experiment

Rotary Inverted Pendulum (RIP) is one of the simplest nonlinear systems commonly used for validating control algorithms. In this study, two controllers, Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Linear Quadratic Regulation (LQR), are simulated and experimentally validated. These controllers are executed in real-time on a PC, while the STM32F407 chip handles control and data acquisition from the pendulum using a high-speed USB interface. Due to the custom-built nature of this model, there are inaccuracies in the model and parameter identification. However, results show that the MPC controller is better at trajectory tracking and maintaining balance near the set point compared to the LQR controller. On the other hand, the LQR controller responds more robustly to disturbances and external forces, highlighting distinct differences between MPC’s optimization over each prediction horizon and LQR’s single-solution approach for the entire prediction horizon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fuzzy Systems and Control
Published
2024-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59247/jfsc.v2i3.263
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model Predictive Control for Rotary Inverted Pendulum: Simulation and Experiment

Nguyen Pham, Hong‐Quan Duong, Ngoc Quynh Bui, Ngoc Thach Le et al.
5 citations
Journal of Fuzzy Systems and Control
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
1.64
article

Model Predictive Control for Rotary Inverted Pendulum: Simulation and Experiment

Nguyen Pham, Hong‐Quan Duong, Ngoc Quynh Bui, Ngoc Thach Le, Van-Dong-Hai Nguyen, Manh V. Nguyen, Hong Nam Nguyen, Đông Đình Lê, Phuc-Hoang Huynh
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Rotary Inverted Pendulum (RIP) is one of the simplest nonlinear systems commonly used for validating control algorithms. In this study, two controllers, Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Linear Quadratic Regulation (LQR), are simulated and experimentally validated. These controllers are executed in real-time on a PC, while the STM32F407 chip handles control and data acquisition from the pendulum using a high-speed USB interface. Due to the custom-built nature of this model, there are inaccuracies in the model and parameter identification. However, results show that the MPC controller is better at trajectory tracking and maintaining balance near the set point compared to the LQR controller. On the other hand, the LQR controller responds more robustly to disturbances and external forces, highlighting distinct differences between MPC’s optimization over each prediction horizon and LQR’s single-solution approach for the entire prediction horizon.

Journal of Fuzzy Systems and ControlVol. 2(3)
Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
1.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.