How effectively can ChatGPT-4 draft data transfer agreements for health research?

The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI), such as ChatGPT-4, is reshaping legal drafting, offering significant potential for streamlining the creation of complex legal documents. However, there is limited scholarly research on how effectively AI can draft specialised contracts, such as data transfer agreements (DTAs) for health research. Unlike common consumer contracts, DTAs are highly specialised and less prevalent in the public data used to train generative AI models, making them a more challenging test of AI's drafting capabilities. This article fills this gap by critically assessing ChatGPT-4's ability to draft DTAs for health research. The study uses a two-stage methodology: first, an iterative process to develop a comprehensive outline, and second, a detailed refinement of each clause. This methodology produced a comprehensive DTA of 6847 words. While this DTA includes all the standard headings, the quality of the clause content varies in terms of clarity and legal precision. Additionally, its alignment with data protection best practices requires further refinement. The findings suggest that although generative AI is a valuable tool for legal drafting, it cannot yet replace the essential role of human legal expertise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04643-z
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How effectively can ChatGPT-4 draft data transfer agreements for health research?

Donrich Willem Thaldar
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

How effectively can ChatGPT-4 draft data transfer agreements for health research?

Donrich Willem Thaldar
article en

Abstract

The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI), such as ChatGPT-4, is reshaping legal drafting, offering significant potential for streamlining the creation of complex legal documents. However, there is limited scholarly research on how effectively AI can draft specialised contracts, such as data transfer agreements (DTAs) for health research. Unlike common consumer contracts, DTAs are highly specialised and less prevalent in the public data used to train generative AI models, making them a more challenging test of AI's drafting capabilities. This article fills this gap by critically assessing ChatGPT-4's ability to draft DTAs for health research. The study uses a two-stage methodology: first, an iterative process to develop a comprehensive outline, and second, a detailed refinement of each clause. This methodology produced a comprehensive DTA of 6847 words. While this DTA includes all the standard headings, the quality of the clause content varies in terms of clarity and legal precision. Additionally, its alignment with data protection best practices requires further refinement. The findings suggest that although generative AI is a valuable tool for legal drafting, it cannot yet replace the essential role of human legal expertise.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How effectively can ChatGPT-4 draft data transfer agreements for health research? — Donrich Willem Thaldar · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS