Artificial intelligence approach for estimating energy density of liquid metal batteries

Achieving a high energy density in liquid metal batteries (LMBs) still remains a big challenge. Due to the multitude of affecting parameters within the system, traditional ways may not fully capture the complexity of LMBs. The artificial intelligence approach can be effectively applied to deal with low energy density issues. Herein, we represented the first implementation of the Gaussian Process Regression to predict the LMBs' energy density to attain the highest accuracy compared to existing models. Four different kernels, namely Exponential, Matern5/2, Rational Quadratic, and Squared Exponential were utilized to achieve the most accurate GPR model. A huge dataset containing 2158 LMB datapoint was gathered from the literature. It contains 41 input parameters, including alloy-related, LMB-related, and creative features. The GPR-Exponential model showed the greatest battery energy density estimate accuracy among the proposed models. The training and testing R<sup>2</sup> values were 0.9976 and 0.9975, respectively, indicating the near-perfect accuracy which makes it the most precise model that has been presented so far. According to sensitivity analysis outcomes, it can be claimed that Sb mole fraction, average ionization energy, and average melting temperature with the respective relevancy factors of 0.6672, 0.6550, and 0.6507 could noticeably affect the LMBs' energy density. Furthermore, the results showed that the LMBs' energy density is more sensitive to the electrode-dependent and operational parameters rather than the electrolyte situation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97287-7
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence approach for estimating energy density of liquid metal batteries

Sina Maghsoudy, Amin Esmaeili, Sajjad Habibzadeh, Alireza Baghban et al.
7 citations
Scientific Reports
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
4.78
article

Artificial intelligence approach for estimating energy density of liquid metal batteries

Sina Maghsoudy, Amin Esmaeili, Sajjad Habibzadeh, Alireza Baghban, Pouya Zakerabbasi
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Achieving a high energy density in liquid metal batteries (LMBs) still remains a big challenge. Due to the multitude of affecting parameters within the system, traditional ways may not fully capture the complexity of LMBs. The artificial intelligence approach can be effectively applied to deal with low energy density issues. Herein, we represented the first implementation of the Gaussian Process Regression to predict the LMBs' energy density to attain the highest accuracy compared to existing models. Four different kernels, namely Exponential, Matern5/2, Rational Quadratic, and Squared Exponential were utilized to achieve the most accurate GPR model. A huge dataset containing 2158 LMB datapoint was gathered from the literature. It contains 41 input parameters, including alloy-related, LMB-related, and creative features. The GPR-Exponential model showed the greatest battery energy density estimate accuracy among the proposed models. The training and testing R<sup>2</sup> values were 0.9976 and 0.9975, respectively, indicating the near-perfect accuracy which makes it the most precise model that has been presented so far. According to sensitivity analysis outcomes, it can be claimed that Sb mole fraction, average ionization energy, and average melting temperature with the respective relevancy factors of 0.6672, 0.6550, and 0.6507 could noticeably affect the LMBs' energy density. Furthermore, the results showed that the LMBs' energy density is more sensitive to the electrode-dependent and operational parameters rather than the electrolyte situation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Amirkabir University of Technology (IR), Qatar Science and Technology Park (QA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
4.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.