Engineering students' perceptions and actual use of AI-based math tools for solving mathematical problems

The immediate advancement of AI technologies as educational technology revolutionized the learning environment of students; contributing to their academic performance will require an understanding of the factors that influenced the acceptance of AI tools. Insufficient studies were seen from literature review that focused on the integrated factors that influenced the perception of acceptance and actual usage of AI-based math tools among engineering students. The objective of this study was to evaluate the variables that influenced the engineering students' perceptions of adoption and actual academic use of AI-based math tools as academic assistance. This study identified the determinants of behavioral, technology use, and motivation by utilizing the higher-order Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT3), self-determination theory, and the variable trust to examine the behavioral intention influencing adoption of AI tools. A total of 565 valid respondents were analyzed through purposive sampling using structural equation modeling. The results revealed that hedonic motivation, perceived competence, performance expectancy, and habit are the most significant indicators of both students' behavioral intentions and actual use of AI-based math tools. The outcome indicated that students are more inclined to utilize AI tools when they find them engaging and are convinced that they can employ them efficiently and incorporate the tools in their academic routines. From the result, perceived autonomy was deemed insignificant to behavioral intentions, suggesting that students utilize AI tools for functionality and benefits in their academic performance rather than the adaptability of the tools. The outcome of the study may be considered evaluating the behavioral intention and adoption of the students towards innovative AI tools. The results in this study could be extended and applied to the assessment of factors in educational technology studies. Proper ethical use, managerial implications, and theoretical contributions were also discussed after obtaining the output of this study - deeming AI math tools as guide and resource among students and not as a substitute for solutions on mathematical problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105004
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engineering students' perceptions and actual use of AI-based math tools for solving mathematical problems

Cláudia Raimundo Reyes, Kimberly García, Ma. Janice J. Gumasing, Ardvin Kester S. Ong
8 citations
Acta Psychologica
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
33.35
article

Engineering students' perceptions and actual use of AI-based math tools for solving mathematical problems

Cláudia Raimundo Reyes, Kimberly García, Ma. Janice J. Gumasing, Ardvin Kester S. Ong
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The immediate advancement of AI technologies as educational technology revolutionized the learning environment of students; contributing to their academic performance will require an understanding of the factors that influenced the acceptance of AI tools. Insufficient studies were seen from literature review that focused on the integrated factors that influenced the perception of acceptance and actual usage of AI-based math tools among engineering students. The objective of this study was to evaluate the variables that influenced the engineering students' perceptions of adoption and actual academic use of AI-based math tools as academic assistance. This study identified the determinants of behavioral, technology use, and motivation by utilizing the higher-order Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT3), self-determination theory, and the variable trust to examine the behavioral intention influencing adoption of AI tools. A total of 565 valid respondents were analyzed through purposive sampling using structural equation modeling. The results revealed that hedonic motivation, perceived competence, performance expectancy, and habit are the most significant indicators of both students' behavioral intentions and actual use of AI-based math tools. The outcome indicated that students are more inclined to utilize AI tools when they find them engaging and are convinced that they can employ them efficiently and incorporate the tools in their academic routines. From the result, perceived autonomy was deemed insignificant to behavioral intentions, suggesting that students utilize AI tools for functionality and benefits in their academic performance rather than the adaptability of the tools. The outcome of the study may be considered evaluating the behavioral intention and adoption of the students towards innovative AI tools. The results in this study could be extended and applied to the assessment of factors in educational technology studies. Proper ethical use, managerial implications, and theoretical contributions were also discussed after obtaining the output of this study - deeming AI math tools as guide and resource among students and not as a substitute for solutions on mathematical problems.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 256
Mapúa University (PH), De La Salle University (PH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
33.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.