Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of different regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic period in Ukraine: a retrospective observational study

Background. COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected treatment of H.pylori and has long-term consequences, in particular, bacterial susceptibility decrease to broad-spectrum antibiotics used for typical H.pylori eradication. Currently, there is limited scientific data on the effectiveness and safety of standard eradication regimens in the post-COVID period. The aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of 10- and 14-day H.pylori eradication regimens used in 2022–2025 and to compare them with the effectiveness and safety of 10-day regimens used over 2019–2021 in Ukraine, as well as to identify the relationship between unsuccessful treatment cases and anamnestic data. Materials and methods. We conducted retrospective multicenter observational study for 2019–2025. A comparative analysis on the effectiveness and safety of various eradication regimens in group I (n = 82) and group II (n = 74) was performed. We determined frequency, intensity, and spectrum of side effects in both groups. A multivariate regression analysis of the relationship between unsuccessful treatment cases and anamnestic data was conducted. Results. Comparative analysis revealed no statistical difference in the eradication rates between groups I and II (p ≥ 0.05). The lowest eradication rate among patients in group II was detected on three-component regimens ESO + CA (67 %) and PANTO + CM/T (70 %). The highest eradication rate was on quadruple regimen ESO + LAF (100 %). In group II, the frequency of side effects, their intensity, and spectrum significantly increased after 14-day treatment (p < 0.001) compared to group I. Regression analysis revealed that male gender, history of COVID-19 infection, and first treatment attempts were significantly more frequently associa­ted with unsuccessful treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusions. Standard 14-day three-component H.pylori eradication regimens ESO + CA, PANTO + CM/T, PANTO + AM/T have unacceptable eradication rates (≤ 70 %). The 14-day quadruple ESO + LAF regimen demonstrates a high eradication rate (> 90 %), but is accompanied by frequent and diverse side effects, reduced adherence to treatment. Treatment failure is significantly associated with male gender, previous COVID-19 infection, and first treatment attempts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GASTROENTEROLOGY
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22141/2308-2097.59.1.2025.658
Primary Topic
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of different regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic period in Ukraine: a retrospective observational study

V.V. Tishchenko, A.E. Baylo, Leonid Pavlovskyi, Volodymyr Chernyavskiy et al.
GASTROENTEROLOGY
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
article

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of different regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic period in Ukraine: a retrospective observational study

V.V. Tishchenko, A.E. Baylo, Leonid Pavlovskyi, Volodymyr Chernyavskiy, L.S. Hvozdetska, D.O. Reshotko
article en

Abstract

Background. COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected treatment of H.pylori and has long-term consequences, in particular, bacterial susceptibility decrease to broad-spectrum antibiotics used for typical H.pylori eradication. Currently, there is limited scientific data on the effectiveness and safety of standard eradication regimens in the post-COVID period. The aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of 10- and 14-day H.pylori eradication regimens used in 2022–2025 and to compare them with the effectiveness and safety of 10-day regimens used over 2019–2021 in Ukraine, as well as to identify the relationship between unsuccessful treatment cases and anamnestic data. Materials and methods. We conducted retrospective multicenter observational study for 2019–2025. A comparative analysis on the effectiveness and safety of various eradication regimens in group I (n = 82) and group II (n = 74) was performed. We determined frequency, intensity, and spectrum of side effects in both groups. A multivariate regression analysis of the relationship between unsuccessful treatment cases and anamnestic data was conducted. Results. Comparative analysis revealed no statistical difference in the eradication rates between groups I and II (p ≥ 0.05). The lowest eradication rate among patients in group II was detected on three-component regimens ESO + CA (67 %) and PANTO + CM/T (70 %). The highest eradication rate was on quadruple regimen ESO + LAF (100 %). In group II, the frequency of side effects, their intensity, and spectrum significantly increased after 14-day treatment (p < 0.001) compared to group I. Regression analysis revealed that male gender, history of COVID-19 infection, and first treatment attempts were significantly more frequently associa­ted with unsuccessful treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusions. Standard 14-day three-component H.pylori eradication regimens ESO + CA, PANTO + CM/T, PANTO + AM/T have unacceptable eradication rates (≤ 70 %). The 14-day quadruple ESO + LAF regimen demonstrates a high eradication rate (> 90 %), but is accompanied by frequent and diverse side effects, reduced adherence to treatment. Treatment failure is significantly associated with male gender, previous COVID-19 infection, and first treatment attempts.

GASTROENTEROLOGYVol. 59(1)
Bogomolets National Medical University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.