Practical application of artificial intelligence for ecological image analysis: Trialling different levels of taxonomic classification to promote convolutional neural network performance

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), into ecological research presents new opportunities for the automated analysis of image-based data. This study explores the practical application of CNNs for ecological image analysis by trialling annotation to different levels of taxonomic classification to determine their impact on model performance. We systematically compare various annotation strategies, evaluating their effects on the accuracy of CNNs in ecological contexts; as well as considering the feasibility of manually annotating training data to different levels. We demonstrate that variation in annotations groupings (animal, phylum or morphology) has little impact on model performance, despite large differences in class numbers. Consequently, the decision for annotators should hinge on whether to invest effort in detailed annotation at the beginning of a project or to perform finer sorting of model predictions at the end. These findings provide practical guidance for optimizing the workflow in AI-driven ecological studies, offering flexibility without compromising model performance. • Manual annotation of images is a significant bottleneck slowing ecological data use. • Assigning coarser taxonomy to individuals would quicken training data compilation. • Using three different levels of taxonomy had minor effects on model performance. • Suggests annotation strategy can be flexible without impacting CNN results. • Optimal AI-driven ecological workflows with minimal annotation effort identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Informatics
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103146
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical application of artificial intelligence for ecological image analysis: Trialling different levels of taxonomic classification to promote convolutional neural network performance

Eleanor R. Cross, Kyran P. Graves, Amelia E.H. Bridges, Nils Piechaud et al.
3 citations
Ecological Informatics
Species Distribution and Climate Change
5.51
article

Practical application of artificial intelligence for ecological image analysis: Trialling different levels of taxonomic classification to promote convolutional neural network performance

Eleanor R. Cross, Kyran P. Graves, Amelia E.H. Bridges, Nils Piechaud, Kerry L. Howell, Antony Raymont
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), into ecological research presents new opportunities for the automated analysis of image-based data. This study explores the practical application of CNNs for ecological image analysis by trialling annotation to different levels of taxonomic classification to determine their impact on model performance. We systematically compare various annotation strategies, evaluating their effects on the accuracy of CNNs in ecological contexts; as well as considering the feasibility of manually annotating training data to different levels. We demonstrate that variation in annotations groupings (animal, phylum or morphology) has little impact on model performance, despite large differences in class numbers. Consequently, the decision for annotators should hinge on whether to invest effort in detailed annotation at the beginning of a project or to perform finer sorting of model predictions at the end. These findings provide practical guidance for optimizing the workflow in AI-driven ecological studies, offering flexibility without compromising model performance. • Manual annotation of images is a significant bottleneck slowing ecological data use. • Assigning coarser taxonomy to individuals would quicken training data compilation. • Using three different levels of taxonomy had minor effects on model performance. • Suggests annotation strategy can be flexible without impacting CNN results. • Optimal AI-driven ecological workflows with minimal annotation effort identified.

Ecological InformaticsVol. 88
Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (NO), Plymouth Marine Laboratory (GB), University of Plymouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
5.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.