A Comparative Analysis of the Functions of the Preverbal Markers

Pidgin and Creole languages are probably not recent innovations in human linguistic history. It is likely that ancient Egyptian, Sumerian, and Chinese soldiers and merchants used variations of Pidgin to communicate with the so-called "barbarians" they encountered at the borders of their empires. Hall (1966:3) The objective of this study is to explore the function of the markers "bin" and "go" in both Jamaican Post-Creole and Hawaiian English. To address this, the researcher has reviewed the works of Bickerton, Mufwene, Todd, Day, and Tsuzaki. Specifically, the study aims to determine whether "bin" functions as a marker of the simple past in Jamaican Post-Creole and Hawaiian English, or it serves a different function. Observations from Bickerton and Day will be central to this analysis. Another key question is whether the marker "wen," derived from "bin," results from tense neutralization, as suggested by Day, or from the process of decreolization, as proposed by Bickerton. Additionally, the study explores whether "go" functions as a marker or simply as a regular verb. To achieve these objectives, the research reviews existing literature and studies related to this topic. The findings indicate that both Jamaican Post-Creole and Hawaiian English use the markers "bin" and "go." While "bin" typically signals the past tense, it cannot be considered merely a marker of the simple past. Bickerton's suggestion to label it as "anterior" seems more accurate. However, this analysis has some limitations, as "bin" is sometimes used with non-stative verbs while still indicating the simple past. Bickerton attributes this to cultural factors rather than linguistic ones, which introduces some ambiguity. The conversion of "bin" to "wen" in Hawaiian may be linked to either the process of decreolization or tense neutralization. Day emphasizes the importance of recognizing decreolization, as it involves significant changes to Creole features, such as the adoption of standard features or sound modifications. The similarity between "bin" and "wen" in terms of neutralization supports the idea that their conversion may be part of the decreolization process. The Hawaiian marker "go" appears to signal the future, conditional mood, and direction. However, its ambiguity suggests that such exceptions are inherent in all languages.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal on Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33193/ijohss.65.2025.812
Primary Topic
Lexicography and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of the Functions of the Preverbal Markers

International Journal on Humanities and Social Sciences
Lexicography and Language Studies
article

A Comparative Analysis of the Functions of the Preverbal Markers

article en

Abstract

Pidgin and Creole languages are probably not recent innovations in human linguistic history. It is likely that ancient Egyptian, Sumerian, and Chinese soldiers and merchants used variations of Pidgin to communicate with the so-called "barbarians" they encountered at the borders of their empires. Hall (1966:3) The objective of this study is to explore the function of the markers "bin" and "go" in both Jamaican Post-Creole and Hawaiian English. To address this, the researcher has reviewed the works of Bickerton, Mufwene, Todd, Day, and Tsuzaki. Specifically, the study aims to determine whether "bin" functions as a marker of the simple past in Jamaican Post-Creole and Hawaiian English, or it serves a different function. Observations from Bickerton and Day will be central to this analysis. Another key question is whether the marker "wen," derived from "bin," results from tense neutralization, as suggested by Day, or from the process of decreolization, as proposed by Bickerton. Additionally, the study explores whether "go" functions as a marker or simply as a regular verb. To achieve these objectives, the research reviews existing literature and studies related to this topic. The findings indicate that both Jamaican Post-Creole and Hawaiian English use the markers "bin" and "go." While "bin" typically signals the past tense, it cannot be considered merely a marker of the simple past. Bickerton's suggestion to label it as "anterior" seems more accurate. However, this analysis has some limitations, as "bin" is sometimes used with non-stative verbs while still indicating the simple past. Bickerton attributes this to cultural factors rather than linguistic ones, which introduces some ambiguity. The conversion of "bin" to "wen" in Hawaiian may be linked to either the process of decreolization or tense neutralization. Day emphasizes the importance of recognizing decreolization, as it involves significant changes to Creole features, such as the adoption of standard features or sound modifications. The similarity between "bin" and "wen" in terms of neutralization supports the idea that their conversion may be part of the decreolization process. The Hawaiian marker "go" appears to signal the future, conditional mood, and direction. However, its ambiguity suggests that such exceptions are inherent in all languages.

International Journal on Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 65
Nawroz University (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Lexicography and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.