The Factor of Digital Inequality (Divide) and Its Impact on the Geography of Cybercrime

The «digital divide» reflects the uneven territorial distribution of information and telecommunication technologies. This phenomenon ought to have an influence on the opportunities for implementing criminal intentions. Unfortunately, the existing criminological works on computer crime (cybercrime) do not provide enough information on its geography. At the same time, the publications of recent years recognize that the existence of a digital divide as a condition for crime. However, this statement has not yet been proven by facts. The current work is devoted to solving this problem. The conducted research revealed some drawbacks in record-keeping and registration that influence the scope of our understanding of the geography of cybercrime. The author presents the calculated values regarding the condition of computer crime in federal districts and specific regions. The article contains a rating of the regions by their level of computer crime, which is then compared to the rating of the regions by their level of digitization. Some generalized conclusions are drawn on this basis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Criminology
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2024.18(6).624-635
Primary Topic
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Factor of Digital Inequality (Divide) and Its Impact on the Geography of Cybercrime

Anton Komarov
Russian Journal of Criminology
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
article

The Factor of Digital Inequality (Divide) and Its Impact on the Geography of Cybercrime

Anton Komarov
article en

Abstract

The «digital divide» reflects the uneven territorial distribution of information and telecommunication technologies. This phenomenon ought to have an influence on the opportunities for implementing criminal intentions. Unfortunately, the existing criminological works on computer crime (cybercrime) do not provide enough information on its geography. At the same time, the publications of recent years recognize that the existence of a digital divide as a condition for crime. However, this statement has not yet been proven by facts. The current work is devoted to solving this problem. The conducted research revealed some drawbacks in record-keeping and registration that influence the scope of our understanding of the geography of cybercrime. The author presents the calculated values regarding the condition of computer crime in federal districts and specific regions. The article contains a rating of the regions by their level of computer crime, which is then compared to the rating of the regions by their level of digitization. Some generalized conclusions are drawn on this basis.

Russian Journal of CriminologyVol. 18(6)
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Factor of Digital Inequality (Divide) and Its Impact on the Geography of Cybercrime — Anton Komarov · Russian Journal of Criminology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS