Inclusion of electronic correspondence and audiovisual materials in legal proceedings

The article discusses the mechanisms for the inclusion of electronic evidence (messengers, audio recordings, video materials, digital correspondence) in civil and arbitration proceedings. The relevance is associated with the rapid increase in digital communication and the need to agree on the evidentiary status of such information. The novelty of the work consists in the comparative study of court decisions, which enables to identify the heterogeneity of practice and the factors influencing the recognition of correspondence or recordings as convincing evidence. The study describes the legal instruments for recording digital data, examines materials on the examination of the authenticity of audio and video evidence, notarization, and inspection of messengers. Particular attention is paid to assessing the legality of such evidence and respect for the rights of interlocutors. The study aimed to formulate the principles of admissibility of electronic files and determine methodological techniques to reduce judges’ doubts when considering materials. An analysis of legislation, judicial practice and scientific literature was conducted to solve the problems. The conclusion presents an overview of the findings comprising the conditions for the use of such evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology and Law
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2025-1-116-123
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusion of electronic correspondence and audiovisual materials in legal proceedings

Т. А. Шавырина, O. S. Matorina, M. V. Orlova
Sociology and Law
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Inclusion of electronic correspondence and audiovisual materials in legal proceedings

Т. А. Шавырина, O. S. Matorina, M. V. Orlova
article en

Abstract

The article discusses the mechanisms for the inclusion of electronic evidence (messengers, audio recordings, video materials, digital correspondence) in civil and arbitration proceedings. The relevance is associated with the rapid increase in digital communication and the need to agree on the evidentiary status of such information. The novelty of the work consists in the comparative study of court decisions, which enables to identify the heterogeneity of practice and the factors influencing the recognition of correspondence or recordings as convincing evidence. The study describes the legal instruments for recording digital data, examines materials on the examination of the authenticity of audio and video evidence, notarization, and inspection of messengers. Particular attention is paid to assessing the legality of such evidence and respect for the rights of interlocutors. The study aimed to formulate the principles of admissibility of electronic files and determine methodological techniques to reduce judges’ doubts when considering materials. An analysis of legislation, judicial practice and scientific literature was conducted to solve the problems. The conclusion presents an overview of the findings comprising the conditions for the use of such evidence.

Sociology and LawVol. 17(1)
All-Russian Research Institute for Fire Protection (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inclusion of electronic correspondence and audiovisual materials in legal proceedings — Т. А. Шавырина, O. S. Matorina, et al. · Sociology and Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS