Comparison of Leading AI Models an Analytical Study of ChatGPT Google Bard and Microsoft Bing

This comparative analysis delves into the capabilities of three prominent Conversational AI models: ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat. The study encompasses a meticulous exploration of their conversational skills, natural language processing abilities, and creative text generation. Methodologically, this study crafts a comprehensive evaluation framework, including complexity levels and tasks for each dimension. Through user-generated responses, key metrics of fluency, coherence, relevance, accuracy, completeness, informativeness, creativity, and relevance were assessed. The results reveal distinctive strengths of the AI models. The theoretical implications lead to recommendations for dynamic learning, ethical considerations, and cross-cultural adaptability. Practically, avenues for future research were proposed, including real-time user feedback integration, multimodal capabilities exploration, and collaborative human-AI interaction studies. The analysis sets the stage for benchmarking and environmental impact assessments, underlining the need for standardized metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ADCAIJ ADVANCES IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE JOURNAL
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14201/adcaij.31857
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Leading AI Models an Analytical Study of ChatGPT Google Bard and Microsoft Bing

Raja Hashim Ali, Talha Ali Khan, Pascal Adomako, Rand Koutaly
12 citations
ADCAIJ ADVANCES IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE JOURNAL
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
7.85
article

Comparison of Leading AI Models an Analytical Study of ChatGPT Google Bard and Microsoft Bing

Raja Hashim Ali, Talha Ali Khan, Pascal Adomako, Rand Koutaly
article en
12 citations

Abstract

This comparative analysis delves into the capabilities of three prominent Conversational AI models: ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat. The study encompasses a meticulous exploration of their conversational skills, natural language processing abilities, and creative text generation. Methodologically, this study crafts a comprehensive evaluation framework, including complexity levels and tasks for each dimension. Through user-generated responses, key metrics of fluency, coherence, relevance, accuracy, completeness, informativeness, creativity, and relevance were assessed. The results reveal distinctive strengths of the AI models. The theoretical implications lead to recommendations for dynamic learning, ethical considerations, and cross-cultural adaptability. Practically, avenues for future research were proposed, including real-time user feedback integration, multimodal capabilities exploration, and collaborative human-AI interaction studies. The analysis sets the stage for benchmarking and environmental impact assessments, underlining the need for standardized metrics.

ADCAIJ ADVANCES IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE JOURNALVol. 14
University of Applied Sciences Potsdam (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
7.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Leading AI Models an Analytical Study of ChatGPT Google Bard and Microsoft Bing — Raja Hashim Ali, Talha Ali Khan, et al. · ADCAIJ ADVANCES IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE JOURNAL (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS