Grok Hackspeak? Communicating Cybersecurity With Figurative Language

This paper investigates how non-experts understand figurative language created by computer scientists to describe cybersecurity incidents. Its method is informed by applied linguistics, crisis communication, and cybersecurity research. Using a set of cyberattack stories composed with figurative words and a set composed with more literal versions, and an online survey, the study examines whether the use of metaphor and neologism clarifies or obfuscates the technical aspects of cybersecurity for non-experts. The results showed participants in the literal set scored significantly better in comprehension. However, participants made important errors in both literal and figurative versions. This underlines the need for organizations to employ language strategically and provide more effective explanations of cybersecurity situations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Business Communication
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884251329160
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grok Hackspeak? Communicating Cybersecurity With Figurative Language

Robert Biddle, Sky Marsen
International Journal of Business Communication
Digital Communication and Language
article

Grok Hackspeak? Communicating Cybersecurity With Figurative Language

Robert Biddle, Sky Marsen
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates how non-experts understand figurative language created by computer scientists to describe cybersecurity incidents. Its method is informed by applied linguistics, crisis communication, and cybersecurity research. Using a set of cyberattack stories composed with figurative words and a set composed with more literal versions, and an online survey, the study examines whether the use of metaphor and neologism clarifies or obfuscates the technical aspects of cybersecurity for non-experts. The results showed participants in the literal set scored significantly better in comprehension. However, participants made important errors in both literal and figurative versions. This underlines the need for organizations to employ language strategically and provide more effective explanations of cybersecurity situations.

International Journal of Business Communication
Flinders University (AU), Carleton University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Digital Communication and Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.