Which Political System Is Appropriate for China? An Exchange on Electoral Democracy and Political Meritocracy

Abstract Which political system is appropriate for China in the foreseeable future? In this dialogue between two scholars with different interpretations of the Confucian tradition, Z hang Qianfan 張千帆 argues that political leaders should be selected by means of electoral democracy, whereas Daniel A. Bell argues that they should be selected according to superior ability and virtue. They justify their arguments by appealing to contrasting views on human nature, political culture, and the role of the state, and draw some practical implications from Confucian-inspired moral and political theories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dao
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-025-09986-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which Political System Is Appropriate for China? An Exchange on Electoral Democracy and Political Meritocracy

Qianfan Zhang, Daniel A. Bell
1 citations
Dao
Chinese history and philosophy
4.20
article

Which Political System Is Appropriate for China? An Exchange on Electoral Democracy and Political Meritocracy

Qianfan Zhang, Daniel A. Bell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Which political system is appropriate for China in the foreseeable future? In this dialogue between two scholars with different interpretations of the Confucian tradition, Z hang Qianfan 張千帆 argues that political leaders should be selected by means of electoral democracy, whereas Daniel A. Bell argues that they should be selected according to superior ability and virtue. They justify their arguments by appealing to contrasting views on human nature, political culture, and the role of the state, and draw some practical implications from Confucian-inspired moral and political theories.

DaoVol. 24(2)
Peking University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Chinese history and philosophy
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.