Divine Manifestation in Perfect Power: Recognising the Spirit of Christ Crucified

Many people question whether God cares for humans. This article considers two questions. First, what kind of divine care for humans is in question? Second, what explains the widespread failure among humans to recognise divine care for them? The best answer to the first question relies on a biblical idea of divine compassion that suffers for what is good for humans as responsible and subsidiary co-rulers with God. Such compassion aims to “perfect” humans as co-rulers with God who co-value and share in divine compassion. The best answer to the second question proposes that effective recognition of divine care requires voluntary human participation in it, by co-valuing and sharing in divine compassion that suffers for humans. Neglect of co-valuing and sharing in divine compassion impedes a person’s felt recognition of the reality and goodness of God. This article develops its proposed answers, in contrast to two contemporary approaches to religious experience from Luke Timothy Johnson and Edward Schillebeeckx.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Irish Theological Quarterly
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400251325863
Primary Topic
Christian Theology and Mission
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Divine Manifestation in Perfect Power: Recognising the Spirit of Christ Crucified

Paul K. Moser
Irish Theological Quarterly
Christian Theology and Mission
article

Divine Manifestation in Perfect Power: Recognising the Spirit of Christ Crucified

Paul K. Moser
article en

Abstract

Many people question whether God cares for humans. This article considers two questions. First, what kind of divine care for humans is in question? Second, what explains the widespread failure among humans to recognise divine care for them? The best answer to the first question relies on a biblical idea of divine compassion that suffers for what is good for humans as responsible and subsidiary co-rulers with God. Such compassion aims to “perfect” humans as co-rulers with God who co-value and share in divine compassion. The best answer to the second question proposes that effective recognition of divine care requires voluntary human participation in it, by co-valuing and sharing in divine compassion that suffers for humans. Neglect of co-valuing and sharing in divine compassion impedes a person’s felt recognition of the reality and goodness of God. This article develops its proposed answers, in contrast to two contemporary approaches to religious experience from Luke Timothy Johnson and Edward Schillebeeckx.

Irish Theological QuarterlyVol. 90(2)
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Christian Theology and Mission
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.