Enhancing Deep Learning and Motivation in University English Education through AI Technology: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Aims: This study explores the impact of AI-assisted learning on academic achievement and learning motivation in university English education. It aims to analyze the effectiveness of different AI-integrated learning environments in enhancing students’ engagement and performance. Study Design: A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating both exploratory and confirmatory quasi-experimental designs. Twenty-four students (six from each group) are selected for eye-tracking. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at University in China over a period of four months. Methodology: The study involved two experimental phases. The exploratory phase analyzed students’ academic achievement and learning motivation in three groups: AI-driven cognitive learning (G group), multimedia-based AI learning (M group), and a control group (D group) using traditional methods. Academic performance data were collected through standardized tests, while motivation levels were assessed using a validated questionnaire. The confirmatory quasi-experimental phase compared the impact of AI-assisted learning in two different classroom types, utilizing academic performance assessments, eye-tracking data, and learning motivation surveys to measure cognitive engagement and learning effectiveness. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA and regression models, were applied to determine significant differences among the groups. Results: Findings indicated that the G group outperformed both the M and D groups in academic achievement, with an average score of 85.6 (SD = 4.2) compared to 78.3 (SD = 5.8) and 72.1 (SD = 7.5), respectively. Eye-tracking data revealed higher attention levels in AI-assisted learning environments. Additionally, students in AI-integrated learning environments exhibited increased motivation and engagement, as reflected in their questionnaire responses. Conclusion: AI-assisted learning significantly enhances students’ academic achievement and motivation in university English education. The results suggest that AI-driven cognitive learning environments are more effective than multimedia-based AI approaches. These findings provide valuable insights for educators and policymakers aiming to optimize AI integration in higher education. Further research is recommended to explore long-term effects and refine AI-based pedagogical strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i41883
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Deep Learning and Motivation in University English Education through AI Technology: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Huang Qiuyang, Yanmei Zhao, Wenling Li
2 citations
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies
Online Learning and Analytics
3.39
article

Enhancing Deep Learning and Motivation in University English Education through AI Technology: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Huang Qiuyang, Yanmei Zhao, Wenling Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Aims: This study explores the impact of AI-assisted learning on academic achievement and learning motivation in university English education. It aims to analyze the effectiveness of different AI-integrated learning environments in enhancing students’ engagement and performance. Study Design: A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating both exploratory and confirmatory quasi-experimental designs. Twenty-four students (six from each group) are selected for eye-tracking. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at University in China over a period of four months. Methodology: The study involved two experimental phases. The exploratory phase analyzed students’ academic achievement and learning motivation in three groups: AI-driven cognitive learning (G group), multimedia-based AI learning (M group), and a control group (D group) using traditional methods. Academic performance data were collected through standardized tests, while motivation levels were assessed using a validated questionnaire. The confirmatory quasi-experimental phase compared the impact of AI-assisted learning in two different classroom types, utilizing academic performance assessments, eye-tracking data, and learning motivation surveys to measure cognitive engagement and learning effectiveness. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA and regression models, were applied to determine significant differences among the groups. Results: Findings indicated that the G group outperformed both the M and D groups in academic achievement, with an average score of 85.6 (SD = 4.2) compared to 78.3 (SD = 5.8) and 72.1 (SD = 7.5), respectively. Eye-tracking data revealed higher attention levels in AI-assisted learning environments. Additionally, students in AI-integrated learning environments exhibited increased motivation and engagement, as reflected in their questionnaire responses. Conclusion: AI-assisted learning significantly enhances students’ academic achievement and motivation in university English education. The results suggest that AI-driven cognitive learning environments are more effective than multimedia-based AI approaches. These findings provide valuable insights for educators and policymakers aiming to optimize AI integration in higher education. Further research is recommended to explore long-term effects and refine AI-based pedagogical strategies.

Asian Journal of Education and Social StudiesVol. 51(4)
Jingdezhen Ceramic Institute (CN), Guangxi Normal University (CN), Guangxi Normal University for Nationalities (CN), Yuxi Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Online Learning and Analytics
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.