Psycometric Validation of an Instrument to Measure Person‐Centred Teamwork in Hospital Settings

<b>Aim:</b> To validate an instrument for measuring healthcare workers' perceptions of person-centred teamwork in hospital units. <b>Design:</b> Quantitative cross-sectional descriptive design. This approach collected numerical data to explore and describe the characteristics of the instrument items, with the goal of generating insights as to the validity and reliability of the items. <b>Methods:</b> The target population included healthcare workers who worked in hospital settings. Total sampling was used to identify healthcare workers. Convenience sampling was used to select the participants. The participants completed the instrument. The data were captured and analysed using the software IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28 and RStudio 2023.06. <b>Results:</b> A 38-item instrument measuring the perceptions of healthcare workers of person-centred teamwork was tested psychometrically. A total of 388 healthcare workers working in private (<i>n</i> = 160) and public (<i>n</i> = 228) hospitals completed the instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis was used, indicating that the items were significant and that the constructs were well measured. Factor loading was present, and bifactor analysis confirmed the multidimensionality of each construct. The Cronbach's <i>α</i> confirmed the reliability of each of the 38 items. <b>Conclusion:</b> The person-centred teamwork instrument was reliable and validated as a multidimensional scale comprising 38 items. The instrument is psychometrically suitable for measuring person-centred teamwork in hospital settings. <b>Implications:</b> The person-centred teamwork instrument provides the ability to measure person-centred teamwork efforts to improve practice. As a measurable concept, person-centred teamwork can be improved by distinguishing areas for improvement. <b>Link to Practice:</b> The 38 item person-centred teamwork instrument indicated good fit for measuring the constructs, and the instrument was validated. Each of the items was reliable for measuring person-centred teamwork. The instrument can be applied internationally to assist in the measurement of person-centred teamwork practices to improve clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Research and Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/nrp/2185757
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psycometric Validation of an Instrument to Measure Person‐Centred Teamwork in Hospital Settings

Alida Viljoen, Tanya Heyns, Paul F. Slater, Andries Masenge et al.
Nursing Research and Practice
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Psycometric Validation of an Instrument to Measure Person‐Centred Teamwork in Hospital Settings

Alida Viljoen, Tanya Heyns, Paul F. Slater, Andries Masenge, Ronell Leech
article en

Abstract

<b>Aim:</b> To validate an instrument for measuring healthcare workers' perceptions of person-centred teamwork in hospital units. <b>Design:</b> Quantitative cross-sectional descriptive design. This approach collected numerical data to explore and describe the characteristics of the instrument items, with the goal of generating insights as to the validity and reliability of the items. <b>Methods:</b> The target population included healthcare workers who worked in hospital settings. Total sampling was used to identify healthcare workers. Convenience sampling was used to select the participants. The participants completed the instrument. The data were captured and analysed using the software IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28 and RStudio 2023.06. <b>Results:</b> A 38-item instrument measuring the perceptions of healthcare workers of person-centred teamwork was tested psychometrically. A total of 388 healthcare workers working in private (<i>n</i> = 160) and public (<i>n</i> = 228) hospitals completed the instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis was used, indicating that the items were significant and that the constructs were well measured. Factor loading was present, and bifactor analysis confirmed the multidimensionality of each construct. The Cronbach's <i>α</i> confirmed the reliability of each of the 38 items. <b>Conclusion:</b> The person-centred teamwork instrument was reliable and validated as a multidimensional scale comprising 38 items. The instrument is psychometrically suitable for measuring person-centred teamwork in hospital settings. <b>Implications:</b> The person-centred teamwork instrument provides the ability to measure person-centred teamwork efforts to improve practice. As a measurable concept, person-centred teamwork can be improved by distinguishing areas for improvement. <b>Link to Practice:</b> The 38 item person-centred teamwork instrument indicated good fit for measuring the constructs, and the instrument was validated. Each of the items was reliable for measuring person-centred teamwork. The instrument can be applied internationally to assist in the measurement of person-centred teamwork practices to improve clinical outcomes.

Nursing Research and PracticeVol. 2025(1)
University of Ulster (GB), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.