Mixed-Methods Approaches to Enhance Rural Special Education Research

Rural special education research is necessary to demonstrate effective practices for rural students, teachers, schools, and communities. However, the majority of educational research is conducted in urban and suburban U.S. schools, which may not generalize adequately to rural locales. Rural special education teacher and student experiences are distinct, and the body of research highlighting their experiences is lacking in multiple ways (e.g., description, rigor). Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches when conducting rural special education research allows for a greater understanding of what works, and for whom, in rural communities. This article shares three mixed-methods approaches (i.e., convergent mixed methods, explanatory sequential mixed methods, and exploratory sequential mixed methods) that are useful for conducting special education research in collaboration with rural constituents. Exemplars, recommendations, and resources are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rural Special Education Quarterly
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705251332594
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed-Methods Approaches to Enhance Rural Special Education Research

Courtney Beers Dewhirst, Brittany L. Hott, Kathleen M. Randolph
Rural Special Education Quarterly
Education Systems and Policy
article

Mixed-Methods Approaches to Enhance Rural Special Education Research

Courtney Beers Dewhirst, Brittany L. Hott, Kathleen M. Randolph
article en

Abstract

Rural special education research is necessary to demonstrate effective practices for rural students, teachers, schools, and communities. However, the majority of educational research is conducted in urban and suburban U.S. schools, which may not generalize adequately to rural locales. Rural special education teacher and student experiences are distinct, and the body of research highlighting their experiences is lacking in multiple ways (e.g., description, rigor). Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches when conducting rural special education research allows for a greater understanding of what works, and for whom, in rural communities. This article shares three mixed-methods approaches (i.e., convergent mixed methods, explanatory sequential mixed methods, and exploratory sequential mixed methods) that are useful for conducting special education research in collaboration with rural constituents. Exemplars, recommendations, and resources are provided.

Rural Special Education QuarterlyVol. 44(4)
Texas State University (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Education Systems and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.