A Comparative Study on Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Versus Motor Relearning Programme on Improving Functional Recovery in Stroke Patients.

Background:Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, significantly impairing motor function and daily living activities. Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in the recovery process, with various therapeutic approaches aimed at restoring motor function and improving quality of life. Two prominent rehabilitation interventions, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and the Motor Relearning Programme (MRP), have demonstrated effectiveness in improving stroke recovery. However, the comparative efficacy of these approaches remains underexplored.This study aims to compare the effectiveness of PNF and MRP in improving functional recovery in stroke patients. Specifically, the study evaluates the impact of these interventions on motor function, balance, and activities of daily living. Methods:A pre-test and post-test experimental design was employed, with 30 stroke patients randomly assigned to either the PNF group (n=15) or the MRP group (n=15). Outcome measures included the Barthel Index for daily activities, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for motor function, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test for functional mobility. The interventions were administered over an 8-week period, with assessments conducted before and after the intervention period. Results:Both PNF and MRP led to significant improvements in motor function, balance, and daily activities. However, the MRP group demonstrated greater improvements in motor control and functional mobility, particularly in tasks requiring higher levels of motor coordination. The PNF group showed more significant improvements in balance and range of motion. Conclusion:Both PNF and MRP are effective rehabilitation approaches for improving functional recovery in stroke patients. While PNF is beneficial for enhancing balance and flexibility, MRP appears to be more effective in promoting motor control and functional independence. These findings suggest that MRP may be a more comprehensive approach for improving stroke rehabilitation outcomes.