Children's Developing Understanding of the Value of Disagreement for Learning

Do children and adults recognize the value of disagreement for learning? Across two preregistered studies (data collected 2023), 4- to 8-year-old children (N = 200, 101 females, mixed ethnicities) and adults (N = 200, 99 females, mixed ethnicities) were asked whether a protagonist would learn more by talking to someone who agrees or disagrees with them about different beliefs. Across studies, participants more often endorsed learning from someone who disagreed with the protagonist when no "correct" answer existed, that is, when beliefs concerned preferences or ambiguous situations, or when the protagonist did not hold the typically "correct" belief. Adults endorsed learning from disagreement and articulated why disagreement is helpful for learning more often than children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Development
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14253
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children's Developing Understanding of the Value of Disagreement for Learning

Ashley Ransom, Kirsten H. Blakey, Samuel Ronfard
4 citations
Child Development
Education and Critical Thinking Development
35.70
article

Children's Developing Understanding of the Value of Disagreement for Learning

Ashley Ransom, Kirsten H. Blakey, Samuel Ronfard
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Do children and adults recognize the value of disagreement for learning? Across two preregistered studies (data collected 2023), 4- to 8-year-old children (N = 200, 101 females, mixed ethnicities) and adults (N = 200, 99 females, mixed ethnicities) were asked whether a protagonist would learn more by talking to someone who agrees or disagrees with them about different beliefs. Across studies, participants more often endorsed learning from someone who disagreed with the protagonist when no "correct" answer existed, that is, when beliefs concerned preferences or ambiguous situations, or when the protagonist did not hold the typically "correct" belief. Adults endorsed learning from disagreement and articulated why disagreement is helpful for learning more often than children.

Child DevelopmentVol. 96(4)
University of Toronto (CA), Saint Mary's University of Minnesota (US)
University of Toronto, University of Toronto Mississauga, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
35.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.