Assessment of colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: Comparison of the rapid polymyxin NP test, MicroScan system, and broth microdilution in Thailand

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a global health crisis, with colistin serving as a last-resort antibiotic for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. However, colistin resistance is becoming increasingly prevalent, necessitating rapid and accurate susceptibility testing. Objective: This study evaluated the rapid polymyxin NP (RPNP) test and the MicroScan antimicrobial susceptibility system compared to the reference broth microdilution (rBMD) method for detecting colistin resistance in colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) isolates from clinical setting in Thailand. Materials and methods: A total of 158 non-repetitive Enterobacteriaceae isolates (85 Escherichia coli and 73 Klebsiella pneumoniae) were collected from a tertiary hospital in Bangkok between August 2021 and January 2023. Colistin susceptibility was assessed using the RPNP, MicroScan system, and rBMD method following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), and major errors (ME) of colistin resistance test results from the RPNP and MicroScan methods were determined by comparison with the rBMD method. Results: Among the 158 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 46.2% were intermediate and 38.6% were colistin-resistant by rBMD. The sensitivity of RPNP was 98.4% and the specificity was 95.9%, compared to 95.1% and 97.9% for MicroScan. Both RPNP and MicroScan achieved high CA (96.8%) with rBMD. Discrepancies, primarily in isolates with borderline MICs (1-4 mg/L), accounted for 4 of the 8 discordant strains. In addition, mobilized colistin resistance-1 (mcr-1) gene were detected in 5 colistin-resistant E. coli isolates with MIC of 8 mg/L. Conclusion: Both the RPNP and MicroScan systems demonstrated high categorical agreement with the rBMD method, underscoring their reliability as practical tools for routine colistin susceptibility testing in clinical microbiology laboratories where rBMD may not be feasible.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Associated Medical Sciences
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12982/jams.2025.063
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: Comparison of the rapid polymyxin NP test, MicroScan system, and broth microdilution in Thailand

Sirinart Chomean, Anek Pootong, Preyanuch Wanglerdsakulchai, Naipapron Dinmuang et al.
Journal of Associated Medical Sciences
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

Assessment of colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: Comparison of the rapid polymyxin NP test, MicroScan system, and broth microdilution in Thailand

Sirinart Chomean, Anek Pootong, Preyanuch Wanglerdsakulchai, Naipapron Dinmuang, Sidaporn Saiaut, Auravee Indar
article en

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a global health crisis, with colistin serving as a last-resort antibiotic for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. However, colistin resistance is becoming increasingly prevalent, necessitating rapid and accurate susceptibility testing. Objective: This study evaluated the rapid polymyxin NP (RPNP) test and the MicroScan antimicrobial susceptibility system compared to the reference broth microdilution (rBMD) method for detecting colistin resistance in colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) isolates from clinical setting in Thailand. Materials and methods: A total of 158 non-repetitive Enterobacteriaceae isolates (85 Escherichia coli and 73 Klebsiella pneumoniae) were collected from a tertiary hospital in Bangkok between August 2021 and January 2023. Colistin susceptibility was assessed using the RPNP, MicroScan system, and rBMD method following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), and major errors (ME) of colistin resistance test results from the RPNP and MicroScan methods were determined by comparison with the rBMD method. Results: Among the 158 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 46.2% were intermediate and 38.6% were colistin-resistant by rBMD. The sensitivity of RPNP was 98.4% and the specificity was 95.9%, compared to 95.1% and 97.9% for MicroScan. Both RPNP and MicroScan achieved high CA (96.8%) with rBMD. Discrepancies, primarily in isolates with borderline MICs (1-4 mg/L), accounted for 4 of the 8 discordant strains. In addition, mobilized colistin resistance-1 (mcr-1) gene were detected in 5 colistin-resistant E. coli isolates with MIC of 8 mg/L. Conclusion: Both the RPNP and MicroScan systems demonstrated high categorical agreement with the rBMD method, underscoring their reliability as practical tools for routine colistin susceptibility testing in clinical microbiology laboratories where rBMD may not be feasible.

Journal of Associated Medical SciencesVol. 58(2)
Thammasat University
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.