Streamflow Monitoring at High Temporal Resolution Based on Non‐Contact Instruments and Manually Surveyed Bathymetry in a River Prone to Bathymetric Shifts

Abstract This study presents a proof of concept of a reliable methodology for monitoring streamflow in a dynamic river of the Alps prone to bathymetric changes using non‐contact instruments. The method relies on water level and surface velocity radar monitoring, discharge measurements by Large‐Scale Particle Image Velocimetry (LSPIV), and topographic surveys. A single proportional relation, stable under bathymetric changes, is established between maximum surface velocity ( V s,max ) and bulk velocity ( U mean ) using LSPIV measurements. The location of the maximum surface velocity is also shown to be relatively stable under bathymetric changes. The Isovel model, a theoretical approach which requires minimal information (i.e., bathymetry, water level and bed roughness) is also used to assess its capacity to predict the V s,max – U mean relation and the location of the maximum surface velocity. Such model could be useful for applying the method in the absence of LSPIV measurements in the future. The applicability of the method is finally tested over a 2.5‐year data set. Discharge is calculated at a time step of 10 min by multiplying the bulk velocity and the wetted cross‐sectional area. The results are compared to the specific discharge time series at the historical station located 2.5 km further upstream, which has a stage‐discharge rating curve, to assess the credibility of the proposed method. Good agreement is generally observed when surface velocity is above 0.7 m/s, but accuracy decreases for lower velocities. A simplified uncertainty analysis estimates a 25% relative error on discharge calculated with the presented method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr037536
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Underwater Acoustics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Streamflow Monitoring at High Temporal Resolution Based on Non‐Contact Instruments and Manually Surveyed Bathymetry in a River Prone to Bathymetric Shifts

Romain Biron, M. Estèves, Guillaume Nord, Guilhem Freche et al.
2 citations
Water Resources Research
Underwater Acoustics Research
3.59
article

Streamflow Monitoring at High Temporal Resolution Based on Non‐Contact Instruments and Manually Surveyed Bathymetry in a River Prone to Bathymetric Shifts

Romain Biron, M. Estèves, Guillaume Nord, Guilhem Freche, Cédric Legoût, Masihullah Hasanyar, Alexandre Hauet, Suffiyan Safdar, Kingsley Obinna Eze, Hervé Denis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study presents a proof of concept of a reliable methodology for monitoring streamflow in a dynamic river of the Alps prone to bathymetric changes using non‐contact instruments. The method relies on water level and surface velocity radar monitoring, discharge measurements by Large‐Scale Particle Image Velocimetry (LSPIV), and topographic surveys. A single proportional relation, stable under bathymetric changes, is established between maximum surface velocity ( V s,max ) and bulk velocity ( U mean ) using LSPIV measurements. The location of the maximum surface velocity is also shown to be relatively stable under bathymetric changes. The Isovel model, a theoretical approach which requires minimal information (i.e., bathymetry, water level and bed roughness) is also used to assess its capacity to predict the V s,max – U mean relation and the location of the maximum surface velocity. Such model could be useful for applying the method in the absence of LSPIV measurements in the future. The applicability of the method is finally tested over a 2.5‐year data set. Discharge is calculated at a time step of 10 min by multiplying the bulk velocity and the wetted cross‐sectional area. The results are compared to the specific discharge time series at the historical station located 2.5 km further upstream, which has a stage‐discharge rating curve, to assess the credibility of the proposed method. Good agreement is generally observed when surface velocity is above 0.7 m/s, but accuracy decreases for lower velocities. A simplified uncertainty analysis estimates a 25% relative error on discharge calculated with the presented method.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(4)
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), University of Vermont (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), TU Wien (AT), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut des Géosciences de l'Environnement (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Institut national des sciences de l'Univers
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Underwater Acoustics Research
3.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.