Biomechanical effects of material selection and micro-groove design for dental implants

Abstract In this study, biomechanical evaluation was performed to select appropriate dental implant material, and the implant-bone model was verified by finite element analysis (FEA). Ti–6Al–4V, ZK60, WE43, HA, and Ta materials were compared using three different multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods according to lightness, functional durability, relative movement, penetration, and cost criteria. The stress, deformation, safety factor, sliding distance, and penetration distributions obtained under four loading conditions were scored according to these evaluation criteria and Ti–6Al–4V was determined as the most successful material. By adding 0.1 mm wide and deep micro-grooves to the dental implant model, an 8.3 % improvement in sliding distance and a 53 % improvement in penetration were achieved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials Testing
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2024-0426
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical effects of material selection and micro-groove design for dental implants

Efe Savran, Fatih Karpat
Materials Testing
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Biomechanical effects of material selection and micro-groove design for dental implants

Efe Savran, Fatih Karpat
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this study, biomechanical evaluation was performed to select appropriate dental implant material, and the implant-bone model was verified by finite element analysis (FEA). Ti–6Al–4V, ZK60, WE43, HA, and Ta materials were compared using three different multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods according to lightness, functional durability, relative movement, penetration, and cost criteria. The stress, deformation, safety factor, sliding distance, and penetration distributions obtained under four loading conditions were scored according to these evaluation criteria and Ti–6Al–4V was determined as the most successful material. By adding 0.1 mm wide and deep micro-grooves to the dental implant model, an 8.3 % improvement in sliding distance and a 53 % improvement in penetration were achieved.

Materials TestingVol. 67(6)
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Biomechanical effects of material selection and micro-groove design for dental implants — Efe Savran, Fatih Karpat · Materials Testing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS