Is source data verification a valid tool to improve data quality of tumour documentation data? A critical assessment

While effective in identifying errors, SDV faced challenges due to ambiguous source data and potential bias from external auditors, as well as being deemed uneconomical. The study suggests SDVs suitability for small sample validation but questions its scalability for large datasets.Implications for health information management:Alternative methods, such as data exchange interfaces to subsystems or plausibility checks, are recommended for enhancing data quality. This study emphasises the need to explore alternatives for improving data quality in tumour documentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Information Management Journal
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583251330432
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is source data verification a valid tool to improve data quality of tumour documentation data? A critical assessment

Theres Fey, Volker Heinemann, P. Hübert, Daniel Nasseh et al.
1 citations
Health Information Management Journal
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.88
article

Is source data verification a valid tool to improve data quality of tumour documentation data? A critical assessment

Theres Fey, Volker Heinemann, P. Hübert, Daniel Nasseh, Julia Kasprzak, Lisa Knaier, Lara Kazmaier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While effective in identifying errors, SDV faced challenges due to ambiguous source data and potential bias from external auditors, as well as being deemed uneconomical. The study suggests SDVs suitability for small sample validation but questions its scalability for large datasets.Implications for health information management:Alternative methods, such as data exchange interfaces to subsystems or plausibility checks, are recommended for enhancing data quality. This study emphasises the need to explore alternatives for improving data quality in tumour documentation.

Health Information Management Journal
LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is source data verification a valid tool to improve data quality of tumour documentation data? A critical assessment — Theres Fey, Volker Heinemann, et al. · Health Information Management Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS