Anaerobic power output by position group in women's soccer players

The purpose of this study was to assess anaerobic power output across different positional groups in women’s collegiate soccer to determine whether significant differences in power exist based on position. Thirty-two players participated in the modified Margaria Kalamen Test (MGK) and categorized by position groups. Results indicated no significant differences in anaerobic power between positions (Goalkeepers, Defenders, Midfielders, and Forwards), as all pairwise comparisons had p-values greater than 0.05. Although Goalkeepers and Forwards exhibited higher mean power values than Midfielders and Defenders, these differences were not statistically significant. The MGK test proved to be a reliable tool for measuring anaerobic power in collegiate soccer players, providing valuable insights for position-specific training. Future research with larger samples and more diverse testing methods is needed to explore the effects of positional training on anaerobic capacity in soccer players.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Science and Nutrition
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/27077012.2025.v6.i1a.308
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anaerobic power output by position group in women's soccer players

Vittorio Romano
Journal of Sports Science and Nutrition
Sports Performance and Training
article

Anaerobic power output by position group in women's soccer players

Vittorio Romano
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess anaerobic power output across different positional groups in women’s collegiate soccer to determine whether significant differences in power exist based on position. Thirty-two players participated in the modified Margaria Kalamen Test (MGK) and categorized by position groups. Results indicated no significant differences in anaerobic power between positions (Goalkeepers, Defenders, Midfielders, and Forwards), as all pairwise comparisons had p-values greater than 0.05. Although Goalkeepers and Forwards exhibited higher mean power values than Midfielders and Defenders, these differences were not statistically significant. The MGK test proved to be a reliable tool for measuring anaerobic power in collegiate soccer players, providing valuable insights for position-specific training. Future research with larger samples and more diverse testing methods is needed to explore the effects of positional training on anaerobic capacity in soccer players.

Journal of Sports Science and NutritionVol. 6(1)
Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.