Evaluation of the level of compliance with radiation protection measures and conventional dosimetry in medical imaging structures in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)

Objective: Assess the level of organization of radiation protection and dosimetry monitoring of medical imaging professionals in the DRC. Results: A total of 186 medical imaging professionals participated in our survey. No personal protective equipment is used by 100% of professionals; the lead apron is used at 95.2%, the lead screen at 68.8%, the safety glasses at 38.7%, the lead gloves at 32.3%, the dosimeter at 16.1%, the protective shoes at 11.3% and the lead helmet at 2.7%. The dosimeter is not worn in 88% of cases and is not read in 91% of cases. Quality control is not ensured in 63.4% of cases. In 94.6%, the participants are unaware of the doses absorbed. Conclusion: Radiation protection measures and dosimetry monitoring of workers are not respected. The absorbed doses are not known. In the absence of conventional dosimetry, biological dosimetry could be proposed as an alternative to assess the risk of exposure to x-rays.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26644436.2025.v8.i1b.445
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the level of compliance with radiation protection measures and conventional dosimetry in medical imaging structures in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)

Martin Moïse, Bomba DI Masuangi Emmanuel, Banza Kissala Kiss, Muaka Diela Marie Josée et al.
International Journal of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Evaluation of the level of compliance with radiation protection measures and conventional dosimetry in medical imaging structures in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)

Martin Moïse, Bomba DI Masuangi Emmanuel, Banza Kissala Kiss, Muaka Diela Marie Josée, Malekera Bujiriri Alphonse
article en

Abstract

Objective: Assess the level of organization of radiation protection and dosimetry monitoring of medical imaging professionals in the DRC. Results: A total of 186 medical imaging professionals participated in our survey. No personal protective equipment is used by 100% of professionals; the lead apron is used at 95.2%, the lead screen at 68.8%, the safety glasses at 38.7%, the lead gloves at 32.3%, the dosimeter at 16.1%, the protective shoes at 11.3% and the lead helmet at 2.7%. The dosimeter is not worn in 88% of cases and is not read in 91% of cases. Quality control is not ensured in 63.4% of cases. In 94.6%, the participants are unaware of the doses absorbed. Conclusion: Radiation protection measures and dosimetry monitoring of workers are not respected. The absorbed doses are not known. In the absence of conventional dosimetry, biological dosimetry could be proposed as an alternative to assess the risk of exposure to x-rays.

International Journal of Radiology and Diagnostic ImagingVol. 8(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.