Managing less influence with a better understanding: the benefit for low-income countries of understanding distance as a field

Purpose In international business research, distance connotes unfamiliarity and misunderstanding. This paper aims to theorize the distance between low-income and higher-income countries, taking as point of departure that low-income countries are generally unimportant business partners of high-income countries, but dependent on the goods, services and markets of many of them. Design/methodology/approach Because low-income countries are dependent upon higher income countries, they have a greater incentive to understand high-income countries than the reverse. Higher income countries not only know little about low-income countries, but among themselves also have varied and often competing interests and concerns. This changes how low-income countries, actors with little influence, make sense of distance. The authors use literature on psychic distance and institutional fields to develop this argument. Findings Rather than managing a series of dyadic distances, low-income countries seek to situate themselves optimally vis-à-vis the range of higher income countries with which they interact. By developing a holistic view of the entire transnational institutional field, they can better navigate and strategically position themselves amongst the more influential high-income countries. Research limitations/implications This work is conceptual, and the authors recommend future research to empirically test their propositions. Social implications This work explains why low-income countries do not necessarily seek aligned interests among higher income counterparts. Originality/value Distance is rarely researched from the perspective of low-income countries. Building on the psychic distance literature, the authors argue that low-income countries have asymmetrically greater motivation and opportunities to overcome distance. This understanding of distance represents a resource for them in conducting business internationally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Perspectives on International Business
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-08-2024-0087
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Business and FDI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing less influence with a better understanding: the benefit for low-income countries of understanding distance as a field

Helena Barnard, Blessing Mahomva
1 citations
Critical Perspectives on International Business
International Business and FDI
2.23
article

Managing less influence with a better understanding: the benefit for low-income countries of understanding distance as a field

Helena Barnard, Blessing Mahomva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose In international business research, distance connotes unfamiliarity and misunderstanding. This paper aims to theorize the distance between low-income and higher-income countries, taking as point of departure that low-income countries are generally unimportant business partners of high-income countries, but dependent on the goods, services and markets of many of them. Design/methodology/approach Because low-income countries are dependent upon higher income countries, they have a greater incentive to understand high-income countries than the reverse. Higher income countries not only know little about low-income countries, but among themselves also have varied and often competing interests and concerns. This changes how low-income countries, actors with little influence, make sense of distance. The authors use literature on psychic distance and institutional fields to develop this argument. Findings Rather than managing a series of dyadic distances, low-income countries seek to situate themselves optimally vis-à-vis the range of higher income countries with which they interact. By developing a holistic view of the entire transnational institutional field, they can better navigate and strategically position themselves amongst the more influential high-income countries. Research limitations/implications This work is conceptual, and the authors recommend future research to empirically test their propositions. Social implications This work explains why low-income countries do not necessarily seek aligned interests among higher income counterparts. Originality/value Distance is rarely researched from the perspective of low-income countries. Building on the psychic distance literature, the authors argue that low-income countries have asymmetrically greater motivation and opportunities to overcome distance. This understanding of distance represents a resource for them in conducting business internationally.

Critical Perspectives on International BusinessVol. 21(4)
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
International Business and FDI
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Managing less influence with a better understanding: the benefit for low-income countries of understanding distance as a field — Helena Barnard, Blessing Mahomva · Critical Perspectives on International Business (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS