Perspective taking and writing quality for secondary students

Abstract In this study, we examined the relation between social perspective taking and writing quality among secondary school students in the United States. The participants included 214 middle and high school students (116 females), with a diverse demographic composition: 71.5% Hispanic, 10% White, 7% Pacific Islander, 5.6% Asian American, 2% African American, and 0.5% Native American. Students were asked to write an argumentative text after reading sources related to a historical topic in history class, and the quality of their essays was rated. Their social perspective taking was measured using a scenario-based assessment where students were presented with scenarios with social conflicts and provided open-ended responses related to various perspectives. These responses were coded based on their articulation, simple, and complex positioning. Structural equation modeling revealed that female students, although marginally significant, tended to have higher levels of social perspective taking compared to their male counterparts after controlling for English learner status, race/ethnicity, poverty status, and grade level. Additionally, perspective taking was positively related to the quality of argumentative writing after controlling for student demographic backgrounds. Future research should explore various dimensions of perspective taking and their impacts on writing in different genres to enhance our understanding of the relation between perspective taking and writing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading and Writing
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10655-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspective taking and writing quality for secondary students

Yucheng Cao, Joong won Lee, Young‐Suk Grace Kim, Min-Kyoung Cho
2 citations
Reading and Writing
Education and Critical Thinking Development
17.85
article

Perspective taking and writing quality for secondary students

Yucheng Cao, Joong won Lee, Young‐Suk Grace Kim, Min-Kyoung Cho
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we examined the relation between social perspective taking and writing quality among secondary school students in the United States. The participants included 214 middle and high school students (116 females), with a diverse demographic composition: 71.5% Hispanic, 10% White, 7% Pacific Islander, 5.6% Asian American, 2% African American, and 0.5% Native American. Students were asked to write an argumentative text after reading sources related to a historical topic in history class, and the quality of their essays was rated. Their social perspective taking was measured using a scenario-based assessment where students were presented with scenarios with social conflicts and provided open-ended responses related to various perspectives. These responses were coded based on their articulation, simple, and complex positioning. Structural equation modeling revealed that female students, although marginally significant, tended to have higher levels of social perspective taking compared to their male counterparts after controlling for English learner status, race/ethnicity, poverty status, and grade level. Additionally, perspective taking was positively related to the quality of argumentative writing after controlling for student demographic backgrounds. Future research should explore various dimensions of perspective taking and their impacts on writing in different genres to enhance our understanding of the relation between perspective taking and writing.

Reading and Writing
Middle Tennessee State University (US), Changwon National University (KR), University of California, Irvine (US), Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR)
Institute of Education Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.