International Ski and Snowboard Federation consensus statement on warm-up and cool-down in competitive alpine and freestyle skiers and snowboarders
In diverse sports, warm-up (WUP) and cool-down (CD) activities are highly effective at improving performance-relevant factors and reducing the risk of injury when applied systematically; however, scientific evidence is widely lacking in snow sports. Similarly, there is a lack of international harmonisation with current best practices; this especially applies to prevention efforts targeting younger athletes. This International Ski and Snowboard Federation (FIS) consensus statement aims to develop and promote recommendations regarding physical and psychological WUP&CD in competitive alpine and freestyle skiers and snowboarders. The selected panel members represented a group of experts diverse in terms of gender, expertise/background, level of competition and skiing and snowboarding discipline. They included researchers, officials, physicians, physiotherapists, coaches or former athletes with extensive experience in the subject area. However, there was a gender imbalance in the composition of the panel (7 women and 13 men) and certain freestyle disciplines (eg, aerials and moguls) were under-represented. Most importantly, there was a strong over-representation of European members (85%) on the consensus panel. For the consensus process, the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method was used. The panellists were asked to rate, discuss and rerate statements derived from the literature or expert/panellist opinions. The process was based on three online consensus sessions with different preparatory and follow-up tasks and three rounds of an online survey to vote on the statements. The final version of the FIS consensus statement was developed and approved after two iterative rounds of manuscript revision by the panel members. It is intended to guide athletes, coaches, medical staff of international and national federations and other entities who can promote and support appropriate WUP&CD practices for competitive alpine and freestyle skiers and snowboarders by providing support, resources or infrastructure.
Authors
- Roald Bahr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5725-4237)
- Maarit Valtonen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8883-2255)
- Karlheinz Waibel
- Johannes Scherr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9948-1024)
- Hubert Hörterer
- Lars Fredrik Engebretsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2294-921X)
- Jan Seiler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3852-9586)
- L. F. Beck (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1576-4075)
- Wolfgang Schobersberger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5657-0307)
- Oriol Bonell Monsonís (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4865-5922)
- Julie Harvey
- Gerald Mitterbauer
- Evert A.L.M. Verhagen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-8234)
- Sheree Bekker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0161-6280)
- Caroline Bolling (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7607-4765)
- Vincent Gouttebarge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0126-4177)
- Dave Collins (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7601-0454)
- Jörg Spörri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0353-1021)
- Marine Alhammoud (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-6051)
- Tina Weirather
Institutions
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR)
- International Olympic Committee (CH)
- English Institute of Sport (GB)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Alpha Technologies (Canada) (CA)
- Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen SFISM (CH)
- Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center (NO)
- Universitätsklinik Balgrist (CH)
- Research Institute for Olympic Sports (FI)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
- University Hospital Innsbruck (AT)
- Urologische Klinik München (DE)
- Health & Safety in Sports (NL)
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
- Published
- 2025-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002351
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.56