Legal Controls on Big Data Price Discrimination for Existing Customers

This article focuses on the legal regulation of price discrimination against existing customers using big data. This practice infringes on consumers' rights to know, fair trade, and personal information protection. However, the current legal system has flaws. For example, price discrimination lacks clear definition and punishment, and there's no accurate definition of “legitimate reasons”. Also, current legislation has obvious gaps in preventing algorithm - related risks. To improve the legal regulation, it is recommended to incorporate differential pricing for consumers into the scope of adjustment of the Price Law, refine the provisions on fair trade conditions in the Law on the Protection of Consumers' Rights and Interests, and improve the rights relief mechanism. Moreover, consumers should be more aware of rights protection, be more price - sensitive, keep evidence, and use judicial procedures or consumer associations to safeguard rights. We aim to create a healthy and orderly Internet economy, ensuring consumers' equal treatment and legal rights in digital transactions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdcf.372895
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Controls on Big Data Price Discrimination for Existing Customers

Ling An
International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

Legal Controls on Big Data Price Discrimination for Existing Customers

Ling An
article en

Abstract

This article focuses on the legal regulation of price discrimination against existing customers using big data. This practice infringes on consumers' rights to know, fair trade, and personal information protection. However, the current legal system has flaws. For example, price discrimination lacks clear definition and punishment, and there's no accurate definition of “legitimate reasons”. Also, current legislation has obvious gaps in preventing algorithm - related risks. To improve the legal regulation, it is recommended to incorporate differential pricing for consumers into the scope of adjustment of the Price Law, refine the provisions on fair trade conditions in the Law on the Protection of Consumers' Rights and Interests, and improve the rights relief mechanism. Moreover, consumers should be more aware of rights protection, be more price - sensitive, keep evidence, and use judicial procedures or consumer associations to safeguard rights. We aim to create a healthy and orderly Internet economy, ensuring consumers' equal treatment and legal rights in digital transactions.

International Journal of Digital Crime and ForensicsVol. 17(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.