Intravenous Labetalol vs Oral Nifedipine in Acute Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction: Hypertensive problems are prevalent during pregnancy and increase the risk of other issues and long-term effects for both the mother and her unborn child.The current study aimed to test the hypothesis that pregnant women experiencing a hypertensive crisis are better treated with oral nifedipine than intravenous (IV) labetalol in terms of reaching their goal blood pressure (BP).Materials and methods: A randomized clinical trial was done with 45 participants in each group over 1 year and 2 months, group A (IV labetalol) and group B (oral nifedipine), from March 2023 to April 2024 at KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research's Dr Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Center, Belagavi.The study included pregnant women of 20 weeks' gestation or more with acute severe hypertension (gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and eclampsia) with systolic BP (SBP) 160 mm Hg and diastolic BP (DBP) 110 mm Hg, presenting to the labor room.Others were excluded.Results: The mean age of patients was similar in both groups (p = 0.753).Group A had primigravida patients 57.78% compared with group B with 46.67% (p-value = 0.018).The mean SBP for all patients was significantly higher in group A (168.4 8.83 mm Hg) compared with group B (163.42 5.07 mm Hg), with a p-value of 0.001.The mean DBP was 103.91 7.05 mm Hg for group A and 100.36 6.4 mm Hg for group B (p = 0.015).In group A, 22.22% of patients and a significant 92.89% of patients in group B achieved the target at 20 minutes.Regarding the number of doses, 57.78% of patients in group A required only one dose, compared with 93.33% in group B. Patients in group A required higher doses and took more time to manage BP.Conclusion: Oral nifedipine is more effective in achieving target BP faster and with fewer doses than IV labetalol.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2602
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intravenous Labetalol vs Oral Nifedipine in Acute Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Vinutha Hanji, Prabu Raja G, Mrityunjay Metgud, Mahadevi Savanur et al.
2 citations
Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
4.11
article

Intravenous Labetalol vs Oral Nifedipine in Acute Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Vinutha Hanji, Prabu Raja G, Mrityunjay Metgud, Mahadevi Savanur, Kamal Patil, Anusha Malapure
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertensive problems are prevalent during pregnancy and increase the risk of other issues and long-term effects for both the mother and her unborn child.The current study aimed to test the hypothesis that pregnant women experiencing a hypertensive crisis are better treated with oral nifedipine than intravenous (IV) labetalol in terms of reaching their goal blood pressure (BP).Materials and methods: A randomized clinical trial was done with 45 participants in each group over 1 year and 2 months, group A (IV labetalol) and group B (oral nifedipine), from March 2023 to April 2024 at KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research's Dr Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Center, Belagavi.The study included pregnant women of 20 weeks' gestation or more with acute severe hypertension (gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and eclampsia) with systolic BP (SBP) 160 mm Hg and diastolic BP (DBP) 110 mm Hg, presenting to the labor room.Others were excluded.Results: The mean age of patients was similar in both groups (p = 0.753).Group A had primigravida patients 57.78% compared with group B with 46.67% (p-value = 0.018).The mean SBP for all patients was significantly higher in group A (168.4 8.83 mm Hg) compared with group B (163.42 5.07 mm Hg), with a p-value of 0.001.The mean DBP was 103.91 7.05 mm Hg for group A and 100.36 6.4 mm Hg for group B (p = 0.015).In group A, 22.22% of patients and a significant 92.89% of patients in group B achieved the target at 20 minutes.Regarding the number of doses, 57.78% of patients in group A required only one dose, compared with 93.33% in group B. Patients in group A required higher doses and took more time to manage BP.Conclusion: Oral nifedipine is more effective in achieving target BP faster and with fewer doses than IV labetalol.

Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and GynaecologyVol. 17(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
4.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intravenous Labetalol vs Oral Nifedipine in Acute Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Vinutha Hanji, Prabu Raja G, et al. · Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS