Assessing Large Multimodal Models for Urban Floodwater Depth Estimation

Abstract Urban flood monitoring is crucial for understanding flood processes and implementing management strategies. However, current monitoring systems cannot comprehensively capture urban flooding dynamics. Here we explore the use of cutting‐edge Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) to estimate floodwater depth from ground‐level images, as alternative observational approaches. Evaluated on two urban flood image data sets, LMMs generate estimations exhibiting acceptable concordance to ground truth, with GPT‐4 achieving the highest accuracy of 0.65 and a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.88. Furthermore, a combined effect of image complexity and textual prompt is found to influence LMMs' performance. Our study systematically demonstrates, for the first time, that LMMs can be effective tools for imaging‐based urban flood monitoring, enlarging the data for flood forecasting and model calibration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr039494
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Large Multimodal Models for Urban Floodwater Depth Estimation

Heng Lyu, Ze Wang, Chi Zhang, Guangtao Fu et al.
5 citations
Water Resources Research
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
5.53
article

Assessing Large Multimodal Models for Urban Floodwater Depth Estimation

Heng Lyu, Ze Wang, Chi Zhang, Guangtao Fu, Shunan Zhou
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Urban flood monitoring is crucial for understanding flood processes and implementing management strategies. However, current monitoring systems cannot comprehensively capture urban flooding dynamics. Here we explore the use of cutting‐edge Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) to estimate floodwater depth from ground‐level images, as alternative observational approaches. Evaluated on two urban flood image data sets, LMMs generate estimations exhibiting acceptable concordance to ground truth, with GPT‐4 achieving the highest accuracy of 0.65 and a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.88. Furthermore, a combined effect of image complexity and textual prompt is found to influence LMMs' performance. Our study systematically demonstrates, for the first time, that LMMs can be effective tools for imaging‐based urban flood monitoring, enlarging the data for flood forecasting and model calibration.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(4)
University of Exeter (GB), Dalian University of Technology (CN)
National Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.