Dairy producers' awareness, perceptions, and barriers to early detection and treatment of lameness on dairy farms: A qualitative focus group study

Lameness is a common and painful condition, making it an important issue in the dairy industry. Whereas moderate and severe cases of lameness are likely to be noticed and dealt with by most dairy producers, mild cases are often overlooked. The barriers to implementing best management practices (BMP) to detect lameness are unknown. The objectives of this study were to understand awareness, perceptions, and barriers to implementation of established BMP for early detection and treatment of lameness of participant dairy farmers. In total, 35 dairy farmers from 2 regions of Ontario (southwestern [n = 3] and eastern [n = 3]) participated in 6 focus groups. Four themes were identified from the transcribed data: (1) perception and rationalization of lameness, (2) reconciling perceived effects and the ability to effect improvement, (3) assessment strategies, and (4) mild lameness detection challenges. Participants viewed the detection of lameness to be the responsibility of producers (i.e., themselves) and often disagreed with external assessors regarding the prevalence of lameness in their herds. They were unsure what the appropriate treatment was for mild lameness and questioned whether it had significant economic effects on their farms. Lameness assessments by producers occurred informally as participants performed other routine tasks. Some participants also reported using the interval between milkings in automatic milking systems as the primary lameness assessment method. Lack of training for employees and themselves, busy daily schedules, and continuously seeing the same cows were raised as important challenges to the detection of mild lameness. Our results suggest that participants viewed mild lameness detection and treatment a low priority with uncertain benefit. Greater recognition by dairy producers of the importance of early identification of lameness and improved access to effective treatment protocols will be needed to advance implementation of BMP for detection and treatment of nonsevere lameness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25965
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dairy producers' awareness, perceptions, and barriers to early detection and treatment of lameness on dairy farms: A qualitative focus group study

Caroline Ritter, David L. Renaud, Michael W. Brunt, D.F. Kelton et al.
4 citations
Journal of Dairy Science
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
9.42
article

Dairy producers' awareness, perceptions, and barriers to early detection and treatment of lameness on dairy farms: A qualitative focus group study

Caroline Ritter, David L. Renaud, Michael W. Brunt, D.F. Kelton, S.J. LeBlanc
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Lameness is a common and painful condition, making it an important issue in the dairy industry. Whereas moderate and severe cases of lameness are likely to be noticed and dealt with by most dairy producers, mild cases are often overlooked. The barriers to implementing best management practices (BMP) to detect lameness are unknown. The objectives of this study were to understand awareness, perceptions, and barriers to implementation of established BMP for early detection and treatment of lameness of participant dairy farmers. In total, 35 dairy farmers from 2 regions of Ontario (southwestern [n = 3] and eastern [n = 3]) participated in 6 focus groups. Four themes were identified from the transcribed data: (1) perception and rationalization of lameness, (2) reconciling perceived effects and the ability to effect improvement, (3) assessment strategies, and (4) mild lameness detection challenges. Participants viewed the detection of lameness to be the responsibility of producers (i.e., themselves) and often disagreed with external assessors regarding the prevalence of lameness in their herds. They were unsure what the appropriate treatment was for mild lameness and questioned whether it had significant economic effects on their farms. Lameness assessments by producers occurred informally as participants performed other routine tasks. Some participants also reported using the interval between milkings in automatic milking systems as the primary lameness assessment method. Lack of training for employees and themselves, busy daily schedules, and continuously seeing the same cows were raised as important challenges to the detection of mild lameness. Our results suggest that participants viewed mild lameness detection and treatment a low priority with uncertain benefit. Greater recognition by dairy producers of the importance of early identification of lameness and improved access to effective treatment protocols will be needed to advance implementation of BMP for detection and treatment of nonsevere lameness.

Journal of Dairy ScienceVol. 108(6)
University of Prince Edward Island (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
9.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.