The flow field characteristics and rock breaking ability of cone-straight abrasive jet, rotary abrasive jet, and straight-rotating mixed abrasive jet

Radial jet drilling (RJD) technology is expected to be a technology for the efficient exploitation of geothermal resources. However, the low rock-breaking efficiency is the major obstacle hindering the development of RJD technology. The flow field characteristics and rock breaking ability of cone-straight abrasive jet, rotary abrasive jet, and straight-rotating mixed abrasive jet are analyzed by numerical simulations and experiments. Results show that the axial velocity of the cone-straight abrasive jet is high, the tangential velocity is basically zero, the radial velocity is also small, and the jet impact area is concentrated in the center. A deep hole with a diameter of only 25 mm is formed when the cone-straight abrasive jet breaks the granite. Due to the presence of the guiding impeller, the rotary abrasive jet basically has no axial velocity and has the highest tangential and radial velocity, so it can break the granite to form a hole with a diameter of about 55 mm and a central bulge. The straight-rotating mixed abrasive jet has a large axial/tangential/radial velocity at the same time, so it can break the granite to form a hole with a diameter of about 52 mm with a low bulge. The results show that the straight-rotating mixed abrasive jet combines the advantages of the cone-straight jet and the rotary jet, and is more suitable for the RJD technology. The research results can provide reference for the development of efficient rock-breaking and hole-forming technology, and promote the development of RJD technology in the field of geothermal development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Petroleum Science
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2025.04.010
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The flow field characteristics and rock breaking ability of cone-straight abrasive jet, rotary abrasive jet, and straight-rotating mixed abrasive jet

Wen-Bin Li, Ergün Kuru, Zhongwei Huang, Jingbin Li et al.
4 citations
Petroleum Science
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
3.81
article

The flow field characteristics and rock breaking ability of cone-straight abrasive jet, rotary abrasive jet, and straight-rotating mixed abrasive jet

Wen-Bin Li, Ergün Kuru, Zhongwei Huang, Jingbin Li, Chenrui Guo, Gensheng Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Radial jet drilling (RJD) technology is expected to be a technology for the efficient exploitation of geothermal resources. However, the low rock-breaking efficiency is the major obstacle hindering the development of RJD technology. The flow field characteristics and rock breaking ability of cone-straight abrasive jet, rotary abrasive jet, and straight-rotating mixed abrasive jet are analyzed by numerical simulations and experiments. Results show that the axial velocity of the cone-straight abrasive jet is high, the tangential velocity is basically zero, the radial velocity is also small, and the jet impact area is concentrated in the center. A deep hole with a diameter of only 25 mm is formed when the cone-straight abrasive jet breaks the granite. Due to the presence of the guiding impeller, the rotary abrasive jet basically has no axial velocity and has the highest tangential and radial velocity, so it can break the granite to form a hole with a diameter of about 55 mm and a central bulge. The straight-rotating mixed abrasive jet has a large axial/tangential/radial velocity at the same time, so it can break the granite to form a hole with a diameter of about 52 mm with a low bulge. The results show that the straight-rotating mixed abrasive jet combines the advantages of the cone-straight jet and the rotary jet, and is more suitable for the RJD technology. The research results can provide reference for the development of efficient rock-breaking and hole-forming technology, and promote the development of RJD technology in the field of geothermal development.

Petroleum ScienceVol. 22(6)
University of Alberta (CA), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
University of Alberta, National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Scholarship Council, Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
3.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.