Decoding wisdom: Evaluating ChatGPT's accuracy and reproducibility in analyzing orthopantomographic images for third molar assessment

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare has opened new avenues for clinical decision support, particularly in radiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT-4o in the radiographic image interpretation of orthopantomograms (OPGs) for assessment of lower third molars, simulating real patient requests for tooth extraction. Thirty OPGs were analyzed, each paired with a standardized prompt submitted to ChatGPT-4o, generating 900 responses (30 per radiograph). Two oral surgery experts independently evaluated the responses using a three-point Likert scale (correct, partially correct/incomplete, incorrect), with disagreements resolved by a third expert. ChatGPT-4o achieved an accuracy rate of 38.44 % (95 % CI: 35.27 %-41.62 %). The percentage agreement among repeated responses was 82.7 %, indicating high consistency, though Gwet's coefficient of agreement (60.4 %) suggested only moderate repeatability. While the model correctly identified general features in some cases, it frequently provided incomplete or fabricated information, particularly in complex radiographs involving overlapping structures or underdeveloped roots. These findings highlight ChatGPT-4o's current limitations in dental radiographic interpretation. Although it demonstrated some capability in analyzing OPGs, its accuracy and reliability remain insufficient for unsupervised clinical use. Professional oversight is essential to prevent diagnostic errors. Further refinement and specialized training of AI models are needed to enhance their performance and ensure safe integration into dental practice, especially in patient-facing applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2025.04.010
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding wisdom: Evaluating ChatGPT's accuracy and reproducibility in analyzing orthopantomographic images for third molar assessment

Alberto Calzada, Simone Arena, Ana Suárez, Yolanda Freire et al.
9 citations
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
5.89
article

Decoding wisdom: Evaluating ChatGPT's accuracy and reproducibility in analyzing orthopantomographic images for third molar assessment

Alberto Calzada, Simone Arena, Ana Suárez, Yolanda Freire, Víctor Díaz‐Flores García, Ana Isabel Castillo Varón
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare has opened new avenues for clinical decision support, particularly in radiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT-4o in the radiographic image interpretation of orthopantomograms (OPGs) for assessment of lower third molars, simulating real patient requests for tooth extraction. Thirty OPGs were analyzed, each paired with a standardized prompt submitted to ChatGPT-4o, generating 900 responses (30 per radiograph). Two oral surgery experts independently evaluated the responses using a three-point Likert scale (correct, partially correct/incomplete, incorrect), with disagreements resolved by a third expert. ChatGPT-4o achieved an accuracy rate of 38.44 % (95 % CI: 35.27 %-41.62 %). The percentage agreement among repeated responses was 82.7 %, indicating high consistency, though Gwet's coefficient of agreement (60.4 %) suggested only moderate repeatability. While the model correctly identified general features in some cases, it frequently provided incomplete or fabricated information, particularly in complex radiographs involving overlapping structures or underdeveloped roots. These findings highlight ChatGPT-4o's current limitations in dental radiographic interpretation. Although it demonstrated some capability in analyzing OPGs, its accuracy and reliability remain insufficient for unsupervised clinical use. Professional oversight is essential to prevent diagnostic errors. Further refinement and specialized training of AI models are needed to enhance their performance and ensure safe integration into dental practice, especially in patient-facing applications.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalVol. 28
Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
5.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.