Validation of a rapid on-farm culture system for group classification of clinical mastitis-causing pathogens

The objective of this diagnostic accuracy study was to compare the use of a rapid tube test system (MastDecide [MD]; Quidee GmbH, Homberg, Germany) to aerobic milk culture for group classification of mastitis pathogens in dairy cattle. A total of 204 milk samples from cows with clinical mastitis (CM) were collected across 60 dairy herds in Ontario, Canada. Samples were collected by dairy producers and their staff and transported refrigerated to the University of Guelph Animal Health Laboratory (Guelph, ON, Canada) on the day of collection. Each sample was tested via MD (gram-positive, gram-negative, or "no growth") and via aerobic milk culture followed by MALDI-TOF (reference method [RM]). The MD and RM results were interpreted at 14 and 24 h after incubation, respectively. An additional assessment was performed regarding the accuracy of intramammary antibiotic treatment decisions (gram-positive: to treat; gram-negative and "no growth" samples: not to treat). Test performance characteristics (overall accuracy, sensitivity [Se], specificity [Sp], and positive [PPV] and negative predictive value [NPV]) as well as Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) were calculated. The RM results were classified as gram-positive (n = 107, 53%), gram-negative (n = 20, 10%), "no growth" (n = 51, 25%), other pathogens (n = 21, 10%), and mixed growth (gram-positive and gram-negative; n = 5, 3%). The Se of the MD test was 58% (95% CI: 47%-67%), 40% (19%-64%), and 61% (50%-72%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and "no growth," respectively. The Sp of the MD test was 73% (63%-81%), 84% (78%-89%), and 75% (66%-82%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and "no growth," respectively. The PPV of the MD test was 68% (57%-78%), 22% (10%-39%), and 62% (50%-73%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and "no growth," respectively; and the NPV was 63% (54%-72%), 93% (87%-96%), and 74% (65%-82%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and "no growth," respectively. The overall test accuracy for Gram stain classification analysis was 57%, with a κ of 0.30. Regarding intramammary antibiotic treatment, the MD test yielded a correct decision relative to the RM for 65% of the cases. Using this on-farm test as a primary guide in CM treatment decisions should be approached with caution, as the risk of false negatives may affect the ability to effectively treat CM cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JDS Communications
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2024-0738
Primary Topic
Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a rapid on-farm culture system for group classification of clinical mastitis-causing pathogens

David L. Renaud, Kelsey L. Spence, T.J. DeVries, Rita Couto Serrenho et al.
JDS Communications
Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
article

Validation of a rapid on-farm culture system for group classification of clinical mastitis-causing pathogens

David L. Renaud, Kelsey L. Spence, T.J. DeVries, Rita Couto Serrenho, Fernando J. Guardado Servellon, Bruno Joaquin Paredes Osorio
article en

Abstract

The objective of this diagnostic accuracy study was to compare the use of a rapid tube test system (MastDecide [MD]; Quidee GmbH, Homberg, Germany) to aerobic milk culture for group classification of mastitis pathogens in dairy cattle. A total of 204 milk samples from cows with clinical mastitis (CM) were collected across 60 dairy herds in Ontario, Canada. Samples were collected by dairy producers and their staff and transported refrigerated to the University of Guelph Animal Health Laboratory (Guelph, ON, Canada) on the day of collection. Each sample was tested via MD (gram-positive, gram-negative, or "no growth") and via aerobic milk culture followed by MALDI-TOF (reference method [RM]). The MD and RM results were interpreted at 14 and 24 h after incubation, respectively. An additional assessment was performed regarding the accuracy of intramammary antibiotic treatment decisions (gram-positive: to treat; gram-negative and "no growth" samples: not to treat). Test performance characteristics (overall accuracy, sensitivity [Se], specificity [Sp], and positive [PPV] and negative predictive value [NPV]) as well as Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) were calculated. The RM results were classified as gram-positive (n = 107, 53%), gram-negative (n = 20, 10%), "no growth" (n = 51, 25%), other pathogens (n = 21, 10%), and mixed growth (gram-positive and gram-negative; n = 5, 3%). The Se of the MD test was 58% (95% CI: 47%-67%), 40% (19%-64%), and 61% (50%-72%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and "no growth," respectively. The Sp of the MD test was 73% (63%-81%), 84% (78%-89%), and 75% (66%-82%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and "no growth," respectively. The PPV of the MD test was 68% (57%-78%), 22% (10%-39%), and 62% (50%-73%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and "no growth," respectively; and the NPV was 63% (54%-72%), 93% (87%-96%), and 74% (65%-82%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and "no growth," respectively. The overall test accuracy for Gram stain classification analysis was 57%, with a κ of 0.30. Regarding intramammary antibiotic treatment, the MD test yielded a correct decision relative to the RM for 65% of the cases. Using this on-farm test as a primary guide in CM treatment decisions should be approached with caution, as the risk of false negatives may affect the ability to effectively treat CM cases.

JDS CommunicationsVol. 6(4)
Elmira College (US), University of Guelph (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.