Analysing disparities between household food waste metrics and their socioeconomic drivers in Chamwino District, Tanzania

Food waste measurement has garnered significant attention in recent years due to its critical role in devising interventions to mitigate the environmental, social, and economic impacts of food waste. However, the absence of a standardized protocol for Food Waste (FdW) quantification remains a key obstacle in formulating and evaluating effective minimization strategies. This study utilizes Bland-Altman plots and regression analysis to evaluate the agreement between Self-Reported Food Waste (SRFW) and Direct Weighing Food Waste (DWFW) in a sample of 402 randomly selected households in Chamwino District, Tanzania. It also investigates the socioeconomic factors influencing disparities between these measurement methods, providing valuable insights into the drivers of these discrepancies. The findings reveal a bias of 0.100067 Kilogram (kg), indicating that SRFW measurements significantly underestimate household FdW. On average, respondents report edible FdW of 0.032703 kg through SRFW, while DWFW measures 0.132769 kg. Furthermore, gender, age, marital status, house ownership, awareness, and price and cost sensitivity are identified as significant factors influencing the bias between the two methods. The study concludes by advocating for increased awareness creation, the combined use of SRFW and DWFW methods, and measures to foster household accountability. These recommendations aim to enhance the accuracy of FdW quantification and support the development of effective waste reduction strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management Bulletin
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2025.100206
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysing disparities between household food waste metrics and their socioeconomic drivers in Chamwino District, Tanzania

Abiud January Bongole, Mary Kulwijila, Denis M. Silayo
1 citations
Waste Management Bulletin
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
1.16
article

Analysing disparities between household food waste metrics and their socioeconomic drivers in Chamwino District, Tanzania

Abiud January Bongole, Mary Kulwijila, Denis M. Silayo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Food waste measurement has garnered significant attention in recent years due to its critical role in devising interventions to mitigate the environmental, social, and economic impacts of food waste. However, the absence of a standardized protocol for Food Waste (FdW) quantification remains a key obstacle in formulating and evaluating effective minimization strategies. This study utilizes Bland-Altman plots and regression analysis to evaluate the agreement between Self-Reported Food Waste (SRFW) and Direct Weighing Food Waste (DWFW) in a sample of 402 randomly selected households in Chamwino District, Tanzania. It also investigates the socioeconomic factors influencing disparities between these measurement methods, providing valuable insights into the drivers of these discrepancies. The findings reveal a bias of 0.100067 Kilogram (kg), indicating that SRFW measurements significantly underestimate household FdW. On average, respondents report edible FdW of 0.032703 kg through SRFW, while DWFW measures 0.132769 kg. Furthermore, gender, age, marital status, house ownership, awareness, and price and cost sensitivity are identified as significant factors influencing the bias between the two methods. The study concludes by advocating for increased awareness creation, the combined use of SRFW and DWFW methods, and measures to foster household accountability. These recommendations aim to enhance the accuracy of FdW quantification and support the development of effective waste reduction strategies.

Waste Management BulletinVol. 3(3)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.