Whither sociological theory in the health field?

Abstract The application of sociological theory to the study of health and health care has a long if chequered career, and there is considerable international variation in the manner of its development and in current practice. In this paper our focus is on the current situation in the UK, although its analysis and arguments clearly have a somewhat broader applicability. We draw loosely on Bourdieu’s notion of a ‘field’ to discuss post-WW2 developments in the theoretical contributions of sociologists to our understanding of health and healthcare, crucially asking: (i) which of these have opened and which closed doors as opportunities or obstacles, respectively; and (ii) whether or not they are cumulative and have delivered some form of ‘progress’. This necessarily involves distinguishing between political and institutional factors as enabling or constraining on the one hand, and the merits and potency of rival sociological theories on the other. Seven themes are explored in relation to mainstream sociology: (a) neoliberalism and academia, (b) precarity, (c) truncations of time, (d) specialisation, (e) metrics, (f) cultural turn and (g) normativity. The contribution concludes with a summary of outstanding and as yet unresolved questions and conflicts facing academics and others working in sociological theory in the health field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Theory & Health
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-025-00217-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whither sociological theory in the health field?

Graham Scambler, Sasha Scambler, Alice Scavarda
2 citations
Social Theory & Health
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
8.40
article

Whither sociological theory in the health field?

Graham Scambler, Sasha Scambler, Alice Scavarda
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The application of sociological theory to the study of health and health care has a long if chequered career, and there is considerable international variation in the manner of its development and in current practice. In this paper our focus is on the current situation in the UK, although its analysis and arguments clearly have a somewhat broader applicability. We draw loosely on Bourdieu’s notion of a ‘field’ to discuss post-WW2 developments in the theoretical contributions of sociologists to our understanding of health and healthcare, crucially asking: (i) which of these have opened and which closed doors as opportunities or obstacles, respectively; and (ii) whether or not they are cumulative and have delivered some form of ‘progress’. This necessarily involves distinguishing between political and institutional factors as enabling or constraining on the one hand, and the merits and potency of rival sociological theories on the other. Seven themes are explored in relation to mainstream sociology: (a) neoliberalism and academia, (b) precarity, (c) truncations of time, (d) specialisation, (e) metrics, (f) cultural turn and (g) normativity. The contribution concludes with a summary of outstanding and as yet unresolved questions and conflicts facing academics and others working in sociological theory in the health field.

Social Theory & HealthVol. 23(1)
King's College London (GB), The London College (GB), University College London (GB), University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.