Role of Midwater Mixed Waves in the Loop Current Separation Events From a Coupled Ocean‐Atmosphere Regional Model and In Situ Observations

Abstract A previously uninvestigated necking‐down region in the Gulf of Mexico, associated with the Loop Current eddy (LCE) separations is defined by the 8–16 days variance below the Loop Current system (LCS) around 88.5°W, using an Ocean‐Atmosphere Coupled Regional‐Community Earth System Model (R‐CESM) 9‐year nature run, which reveals the mechanisms of Loop Current (LC) deep dynamics. Scaled wavelet analysis of flow fields in five regions at the 27.5 kg/m 3 potential density layer under the LCS shows that the 8–16 days variance is reproduced by the R‐CESM model dynamics, aligning with in situ observations. This weather band deep variance, identified as the mixed waves located between the mixed Rossby‐gravity waves and Rossby waves in the ocean wave dispersion relationship, is stimulated by the interaction between the penetrating LC and steep topography. Then, these waves are released from the constraints of the topography and become free wave trains. There are three critical regions for the propagating wave trains: the Mississippi Fan, the Yucatan Shelf, and the Florida Escapement. The various wave trains define five distinct scenarios: East Yucatan Shelf (EYSS), West Yucatan Shelf (WYSS), west Florida escarpment (WFES), Mississippi Fan (MFS), and quiescent (QS) scenarios. The scenarios passing through the west necking‐down region can be used to indicate the LCE separations. After the separations, the retracted LC may encounter interference from either the EYSS or the WFES, preventing the reattachments. These 8–16‐day waves offer insights into describing the LC shedding events from the lower layer of the LCS, enhancing the understanding of LCS dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jc021330
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Midwater Mixed Waves in the Loop Current Separation Events From a Coupled Ocean‐Atmosphere Regional Model and In Situ Observations

Chuan‐Yuan Hsu, Anthony H. Knap, Ping Chang, Steven F. DiMarco et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
1.79
article

Role of Midwater Mixed Waves in the Loop Current Separation Events From a Coupled Ocean‐Atmosphere Regional Model and In Situ Observations

Chuan‐Yuan Hsu, Anthony H. Knap, Ping Chang, Steven F. DiMarco, Jaison Kurian, Dan Fu, Yun Liu, Ge Xiao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract A previously uninvestigated necking‐down region in the Gulf of Mexico, associated with the Loop Current eddy (LCE) separations is defined by the 8–16 days variance below the Loop Current system (LCS) around 88.5°W, using an Ocean‐Atmosphere Coupled Regional‐Community Earth System Model (R‐CESM) 9‐year nature run, which reveals the mechanisms of Loop Current (LC) deep dynamics. Scaled wavelet analysis of flow fields in five regions at the 27.5 kg/m 3 potential density layer under the LCS shows that the 8–16 days variance is reproduced by the R‐CESM model dynamics, aligning with in situ observations. This weather band deep variance, identified as the mixed waves located between the mixed Rossby‐gravity waves and Rossby waves in the ocean wave dispersion relationship, is stimulated by the interaction between the penetrating LC and steep topography. Then, these waves are released from the constraints of the topography and become free wave trains. There are three critical regions for the propagating wave trains: the Mississippi Fan, the Yucatan Shelf, and the Florida Escapement. The various wave trains define five distinct scenarios: East Yucatan Shelf (EYSS), West Yucatan Shelf (WYSS), west Florida escarpment (WFES), Mississippi Fan (MFS), and quiescent (QS) scenarios. The scenarios passing through the west necking‐down region can be used to indicate the LCE separations. After the separations, the retracted LC may encounter interference from either the EYSS or the WFES, preventing the reattachments. These 8–16‐day waves offer insights into describing the LC shedding events from the lower layer of the LCS, enhancing the understanding of LCS dynamics.

Journal of Geophysical Research OceansVol. 130(4)
Texas A&M University (US)
Gulf Research Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.