Co-occurring foundation species increase habitat heterogeneity across estuarine intertidal environments on the South Island of New Zealand

Estuaries are traditionally considered sedimentary 'bare' ecosystems, dominated by infauna that bury into sediments to avoid being eaten by fish or birds. However, estuaries can be converted to biogenic complex 'hard' habitats, like seagrass beds, seaweed patches or surface-deposits of live or dead shells. Furthermore, habitat heterogeneity is enhanced if these foundation species co-occur. Still, few studies have quantified abundances and co-occurrences of different types of foundation species along spatiotemporal stress gradients. We therefore quantified abundances of seagrasses (Zostera muelleri), seaweeds (Ulva spp., Gracilaria chilensis), surface deposited dead shells and densities of dominant and partly buried cockles (Austrovenus stutchburyi) in estuaries on the South Island of New Zealand. A total of 927 large-scale drone images, 1264 small-scale camera images, and 160 sediment-quadrats were collected from 32 common estuarine environments (fully crossed 5-factorial surveys with 2 latitudes x 2 sites x 2 intertidal elevations x 2 seasons x 2 intra-seasonal sampling months). Across the 32 environments, seagrass was most abundant (19-22 % cover, depending on sampling method), followed by shells (9-13 %) and seaweed (4 %). Scattered seaweed and shells were, despite their low cover, ubiquitous in the 32 environments, and seagrasses always co-occurred with shells and/or seaweed. The spatial gradients had a stronger influence on abundances of foundation species than temporal factors, that mainly affected seaweed and live cockles, with high (70 %), medium (50 %) and low (30 %) statistical agreement between analysis of drone vs. camera images for seaweed, shells and seagrass, respectively. Finally, correlation analysis revealed negative associations between seagrasses and both shells and seaweed, but with large variation between seasons. Our study highlights that foundation species rarely occur as single-species stands, and that the ecological impacts of scattered seaweeds and dead surface-deposited shells within seagrass beds should be studied in more detail. Our findings also underscore the critical role of spatiotemporal stressors in shaping estuarine ecosystems and highlight the importance of using supplementary sampling methods to inform management strategies for estuaries in the face of environmental change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Environmental Research
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2025.107150
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal plant biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-occurring foundation species increase habitat heterogeneity across estuarine intertidal environments on the South Island of New Zealand

Mads S. Thomsen, Ken Joseph E. Clemente
Marine Environmental Research
Marine and coastal plant biology
article

Co-occurring foundation species increase habitat heterogeneity across estuarine intertidal environments on the South Island of New Zealand

Mads S. Thomsen, Ken Joseph E. Clemente
article en

Abstract

Estuaries are traditionally considered sedimentary 'bare' ecosystems, dominated by infauna that bury into sediments to avoid being eaten by fish or birds. However, estuaries can be converted to biogenic complex 'hard' habitats, like seagrass beds, seaweed patches or surface-deposits of live or dead shells. Furthermore, habitat heterogeneity is enhanced if these foundation species co-occur. Still, few studies have quantified abundances and co-occurrences of different types of foundation species along spatiotemporal stress gradients. We therefore quantified abundances of seagrasses (Zostera muelleri), seaweeds (Ulva spp., Gracilaria chilensis), surface deposited dead shells and densities of dominant and partly buried cockles (Austrovenus stutchburyi) in estuaries on the South Island of New Zealand. A total of 927 large-scale drone images, 1264 small-scale camera images, and 160 sediment-quadrats were collected from 32 common estuarine environments (fully crossed 5-factorial surveys with 2 latitudes x 2 sites x 2 intertidal elevations x 2 seasons x 2 intra-seasonal sampling months). Across the 32 environments, seagrass was most abundant (19-22 % cover, depending on sampling method), followed by shells (9-13 %) and seaweed (4 %). Scattered seaweed and shells were, despite their low cover, ubiquitous in the 32 environments, and seagrasses always co-occurred with shells and/or seaweed. The spatial gradients had a stronger influence on abundances of foundation species than temporal factors, that mainly affected seaweed and live cockles, with high (70 %), medium (50 %) and low (30 %) statistical agreement between analysis of drone vs. camera images for seaweed, shells and seagrass, respectively. Finally, correlation analysis revealed negative associations between seagrasses and both shells and seaweed, but with large variation between seasons. Our study highlights that foundation species rarely occur as single-species stands, and that the ecological impacts of scattered seaweeds and dead surface-deposited shells within seagrass beds should be studied in more detail. Our findings also underscore the critical role of spatiotemporal stressors in shaping estuarine ecosystems and highlight the importance of using supplementary sampling methods to inform management strategies for estuaries in the face of environmental change.

Marine Environmental ResearchVol. 208
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Marine and coastal plant biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.