Technical Considerations for Detecting Protein–Protein Interactions Using Proximity Ligation Assay

Proximity ligation assay has been widely used to detect protein-protein interaction in cells and tissues. While with great sensitivity, its specificity was often neglected. Here, we report the existence of varying levels of false positives observed with this assay, most likely due to its high sensitivity. We also provide suggestions to minimize false positives for more accurate detection of protein-protein interactions, especially for membrane proteins. These suggestions include co-staining target proteins, using various negative controls and suitable antibodies, avoiding detergents if possible, and validating interactions with complementary methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00855
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical Considerations for Detecting Protein–Protein Interactions Using Proximity Ligation Assay

Hao Chang, Zach Tower
1 citations
Journal of Proteome Research
Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
0.81
article

Technical Considerations for Detecting Protein–Protein Interactions Using Proximity Ligation Assay

Hao Chang, Zach Tower
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Proximity ligation assay has been widely used to detect protein-protein interaction in cells and tissues. While with great sensitivity, its specificity was often neglected. Here, we report the existence of varying levels of false positives observed with this assay, most likely due to its high sensitivity. We also provide suggestions to minimize false positives for more accurate detection of protein-protein interactions, especially for membrane proteins. These suggestions include co-staining target proteins, using various negative controls and suitable antibodies, avoiding detergents if possible, and validating interactions with complementary methods.

Journal of Proteome ResearchVol. 24(5)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Technical Considerations for Detecting Protein–Protein Interactions Using Proximity Ligation Assay — Hao Chang, Zach Tower · Journal of Proteome Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS