Eco-theological anthropology in Christianity: imago Dei and ecological preservation

Genesis 1:26 states that humankind has been created in the image of God. There are three general interpretations of what this means. While the substantial view emphasises the essence of humankind and the relational view underscores the social aspect, the functional view highlights the responsibility of humankind to God’s creation. Recent studies have suggested that the substantial view was dominant in the pre-modern period and the functional view has become more popular in contemporary Christian theology. Contribution: This study carries out a diachronic analysis that demonstrates that the functional view was always implicit in the substantial and relational views. Therefore, the responsibility that humankind bears towards the natural world is not a departure from the original denotation of imago Dei; rather, it is a faithful representation of it. The second encyclical of Pope Francis, Laudato si’, testifies to this. Pope Francis draws attention to the functional view of imago Dei as an implicit part of the substantial view because of the just dominion that humankind should exercise over the rest of God’s creation, which would reflect the dominion of God in a spatiotemporal way. Further, he asseverates that the vertical relationship with God cannot be extricated from the horizontal relationship with God’s creatures, thereby functionalising the relational view.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v81i1.10367
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eco-theological anthropology in Christianity: imago Dei and ecological preservation

Ismail Lala
1 citations
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
4.20
article

Eco-theological anthropology in Christianity: imago Dei and ecological preservation

Ismail Lala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Genesis 1:26 states that humankind has been created in the image of God. There are three general interpretations of what this means. While the substantial view emphasises the essence of humankind and the relational view underscores the social aspect, the functional view highlights the responsibility of humankind to God’s creation. Recent studies have suggested that the substantial view was dominant in the pre-modern period and the functional view has become more popular in contemporary Christian theology. Contribution: This study carries out a diachronic analysis that demonstrates that the functional view was always implicit in the substantial and relational views. Therefore, the responsibility that humankind bears towards the natural world is not a departure from the original denotation of imago Dei; rather, it is a faithful representation of it. The second encyclical of Pope Francis, Laudato si’, testifies to this. Pope Francis draws attention to the functional view of imago Dei as an implicit part of the substantial view because of the just dominion that humankind should exercise over the rest of God’s creation, which would reflect the dominion of God in a spatiotemporal way. Further, he asseverates that the vertical relationship with God cannot be extricated from the horizontal relationship with God’s creatures, thereby functionalising the relational view.

HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological StudiesVol. 81(1)
Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.