Comparison of Risk Assessment Tools’ Prediction of Outcomes for Penetrating Trauma
For penetrating trauma, all three models were similarly excellent at predicting mortality. NSQIP-SRC and ASA-PS better predicted LOS and NSQIP-SRC best predicted complications, suggesting these are better tools for prognostication of outcomes for penetrating trauma.
Authors
- Tiffany Lian
- Tiffany S. Moon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-5169)
- Xi Luo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3919-2495)
- Areg Grigorian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0998-796X)
- Matthew J. Forestiere
- Thomas Shoultz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2655-3968)
- Jose R. Navas‐Blanco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4026-0646)
- Joni Ricks‐Oddie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9305-7692)
- Roman Dudaryk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9704-7539)
- Jeffrey Santos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7345-3535)
- Kazuhide Matsushima (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9625-5363)
- Catherine M. Kuza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9403-7936)
- Jeffry T. Nahmias (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0094-571X)
- Anne Feeler
- Georgia Vasileiou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9702-1753)
Institutions
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- University of California, Irvine Medical Center (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Surgical Research
- Published
- 2025-04-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.006
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.51