Classification Accuracy of Linear Discriminant Function using Principal Components with Multiple Correlated Variables: A Simulation based Exploration

A BSTRACT Background: Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) is a powerful and widely used technique for classification with correlated variables. Principal Components (PCs) group these variables into linear combinations and produce independent variables. The LDA on these PC’s may provide better classification accuracy in clinical diagnostics than on usual measurements. Methodology: Two datasets were utilized for demonstration: one from a Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL) case-control study and the other from a Gall Bladder (GB) case-control study. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) was conducted on the actual correlated measured variables for group classification, as well as on the derived principal component variables, to compare their classification accuracies. Performance metrics including Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), Classification Accuracy, and F1 Score were assessed. For validation, a third simulated dataset was employed. Additionally, LDA was performed on each dataset using eigenvectors of the control group applied to the cases and vice versa, revealing a strong agreement in classification as measured by the kappa statistic. Results: When LDA was applied to the actual lipid measurements in the SSNHL dataset, the classification accuracy was 57.2%, and the F1 score was 39.7%. However, when LDA was performed using principal components (PCs), the classification accuracy markedly improved to 99.2%, with an F1 score of 98.5%. Similarly, for the GB cancer dataset, the classification accuracy and F1 score were initially 77.2% and 77.3%, respectively. Upon applying LDA with the PCs, these metrics were significantly enhanced to 98.4% and 98.3%, respectively. For the simulated dataset, both the classification accuracy and F1 score were 99.1%. The study also demonstrated that the classification accuracy and F1 score remained consistent regardless of whether the eigenvectors from the cases or controls were used to classify new subjects (Kappa Statistic = 0.962, P < 0.001). Conclusion: In group separation, utilizing principal components significantly improves classification accuracy and overall performance metrics, outperforming the use of the original correlated predictors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Journal of Dr D Y Patil Vidyapeeth
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_895_24
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification Accuracy of Linear Discriminant Function using Principal Components with Multiple Correlated Variables: A Simulation based Exploration

Ashish Kumar Yadav, Durgesh Shukla, Akash Mishra, Sachit Ganapathy et al.
Medical Journal of Dr D Y Patil Vidyapeeth
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
article

Classification Accuracy of Linear Discriminant Function using Principal Components with Multiple Correlated Variables: A Simulation based Exploration

Ashish Kumar Yadav, Durgesh Shukla, Akash Mishra, Sachit Ganapathy, Rajat Vohra, Kuldeep Soni, Sreekumaran Nair
article en

Abstract

A BSTRACT Background: Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) is a powerful and widely used technique for classification with correlated variables. Principal Components (PCs) group these variables into linear combinations and produce independent variables. The LDA on these PC’s may provide better classification accuracy in clinical diagnostics than on usual measurements. Methodology: Two datasets were utilized for demonstration: one from a Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL) case-control study and the other from a Gall Bladder (GB) case-control study. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) was conducted on the actual correlated measured variables for group classification, as well as on the derived principal component variables, to compare their classification accuracies. Performance metrics including Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), Classification Accuracy, and F1 Score were assessed. For validation, a third simulated dataset was employed. Additionally, LDA was performed on each dataset using eigenvectors of the control group applied to the cases and vice versa, revealing a strong agreement in classification as measured by the kappa statistic. Results: When LDA was applied to the actual lipid measurements in the SSNHL dataset, the classification accuracy was 57.2%, and the F1 score was 39.7%. However, when LDA was performed using principal components (PCs), the classification accuracy markedly improved to 99.2%, with an F1 score of 98.5%. Similarly, for the GB cancer dataset, the classification accuracy and F1 score were initially 77.2% and 77.3%, respectively. Upon applying LDA with the PCs, these metrics were significantly enhanced to 98.4% and 98.3%, respectively. For the simulated dataset, both the classification accuracy and F1 score were 99.1%. The study also demonstrated that the classification accuracy and F1 score remained consistent regardless of whether the eigenvectors from the cases or controls were used to classify new subjects (Kappa Statistic = 0.962, P < 0.001). Conclusion: In group separation, utilizing principal components significantly improves classification accuracy and overall performance metrics, outperforming the use of the original correlated predictors.

Medical Journal of Dr D Y Patil VidyapeethVol. 18(5)
Pondicherry University (IN), Pfizer (India) (IN), Government Medical College (IN), Indian Institute of Technology BHU (IN), Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN), Banaras Hindu University (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.