Detecting Anomalies in Network Traffic Using Fuzzy Logic with A Comparative Analysis Against Deep Learning Techniques

Network traffic anomaly detection plays a crucial role in cybersecurity by identifying suspicious activities that may indicate cyberattacks, malware infections, or unauthorized access. Traditional rulebased methods often struggle with evolving attack patterns, necessitating more adaptive and intelligent approaches. This study explores the effectiveness of Fuzzy Logic and Deep Learning models (LSTM, Autoencoder, CNN) for detecting anomalies in network traffic. Fuzzy Logic offers an interpretable rulebased framework for handling uncertainty, while deep learning models leverage data-driven learning for improved anomaly detection accuracy. Using publicly available datasets such as NSL-KDD and CICIDS 2017, we evaluate these methods based on key metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score. The results indicate that while Fuzzy Logic provides reasonable accuracy (85.2%), deep learning models—particularly CNN (94.1%) and LSTM (92.4%)—demonstrate superior performance. CNN outperforms other models due to its ability to recognize spatial patterns in network traffic, while LSTM effectively captures sequential dependencies. These findings highlight the trade-off between interpretability and accuracy, suggesting that deep learning models are more effective for real-time and large-scale anomaly detection, whereas Fuzzy Logic remains a viable option where transparency is prioritized

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Journal of Engineering Innovations and Interdisciplinary Research
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33425/3066-1226.1064
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Anomalies in Network Traffic Using Fuzzy Logic with A Comparative Analysis Against Deep Learning Techniques

G. Sailaja, N Padmaja, Siva Prasad Reddy KV, Harshanvitha Nallamekala
Global Journal of Engineering Innovations and Interdisciplinary Research
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
article

Detecting Anomalies in Network Traffic Using Fuzzy Logic with A Comparative Analysis Against Deep Learning Techniques

G. Sailaja, N Padmaja, Siva Prasad Reddy KV, Harshanvitha Nallamekala
article en

Abstract

Network traffic anomaly detection plays a crucial role in cybersecurity by identifying suspicious activities that may indicate cyberattacks, malware infections, or unauthorized access. Traditional rulebased methods often struggle with evolving attack patterns, necessitating more adaptive and intelligent approaches. This study explores the effectiveness of Fuzzy Logic and Deep Learning models (LSTM, Autoencoder, CNN) for detecting anomalies in network traffic. Fuzzy Logic offers an interpretable rulebased framework for handling uncertainty, while deep learning models leverage data-driven learning for improved anomaly detection accuracy. Using publicly available datasets such as NSL-KDD and CICIDS 2017, we evaluate these methods based on key metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score. The results indicate that while Fuzzy Logic provides reasonable accuracy (85.2%), deep learning models—particularly CNN (94.1%) and LSTM (92.4%)—demonstrate superior performance. CNN outperforms other models due to its ability to recognize spatial patterns in network traffic, while LSTM effectively captures sequential dependencies. These findings highlight the trade-off between interpretability and accuracy, suggesting that deep learning models are more effective for real-time and large-scale anomaly detection, whereas Fuzzy Logic remains a viable option where transparency is prioritized

Global Journal of Engineering Innovations and Interdisciplinary ResearchVol. 5(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.