Tackling Poverty Across the United Kingdom. Devolution, Difference and Discourse

ABSTRACT The UK welfare state is often considered as being highly centralised, yet the design and administration of UK social security involves significant spatial variations in law, policy, and practice. As such, where you live in the UK can affect the value of benefits and cash transfers you are entitled to, as well as how you experience benefit administration. In this article we advocate for greater consideration of spatial variations in social security and draw attention to existing policy differences in the devolved nations and across localities. The article explores policy discourse and design differences to identify competing narratives and to encourage greater consideration of spatial policy developments in social security. Drawing attention to the Safety Nets research project, it argues that a better understanding of the causes and outcomes of spatial variation in social security provision is necessary in the context of governance reforms to increase devolution and decentralistion including the rise of mayoral regions in England.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IPPR Progressive Review
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.70000
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tackling Poverty Across the United Kingdom. Devolution, Difference and Discourse

John Hudson, Ruth Patrick, Mark Simpson, Hayley Bennett
IPPR Progressive Review
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Tackling Poverty Across the United Kingdom. Devolution, Difference and Discourse

John Hudson, Ruth Patrick, Mark Simpson, Hayley Bennett
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The UK welfare state is often considered as being highly centralised, yet the design and administration of UK social security involves significant spatial variations in law, policy, and practice. As such, where you live in the UK can affect the value of benefits and cash transfers you are entitled to, as well as how you experience benefit administration. In this article we advocate for greater consideration of spatial variations in social security and draw attention to existing policy differences in the devolved nations and across localities. The article explores policy discourse and design differences to identify competing narratives and to encourage greater consideration of spatial policy developments in social security. Drawing attention to the Safety Nets research project, it argues that a better understanding of the causes and outcomes of spatial variation in social security provision is necessary in the context of governance reforms to increase devolution and decentralistion including the rise of mayoral regions in England.

IPPR Progressive Review
University of Ulster (GB), University of York (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Nuffield Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tackling Poverty Across the United Kingdom. Devolution, Difference and Discourse — John Hudson, Ruth Patrick, et al. · IPPR Progressive Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS