What (in)compatibilities between the local food shopping and digitalization of short food supply chains?

Purpose Producers develop new digital technologies and services to retail their local foods. However, while digitalization of short food supply chains (SFSCs) is praised by producers, what do shoppers think? “Technological optimism” does not explain why technologies offered by producers are sometimes ignored, quickly abandoned or are the subject of consumer resistance. Consequently, this research explores (1) the perceived values of local food shopping in SFSCs and (2) the perceived benefits and drawbacks by local food shoppers regarding the digitization of SFSCs. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with 31 consumers who utilized digitalized short food supply chains for their local food shopping. The interviews conducted were fully recorded and transcribed; before that, a thematic content analysis was carried out by using NVivo software. Findings Results show the perceived values of local food shopping in SFSCs. These values are categorized into four key dimensions: utilitarian, hedonic, civism and social. Beyond developing an in-depth conceptualization of local food shopping, this research also shed light on the perceived benefits and drawbacks concerning digital technologies offered by producers. By confronting these positive and negative elements, three paradoxes of the digitalization of SFSCs emerge: a paradox of virtual information, a paradox of automated authenticity and a paradox of alienating freedom. Originality/value This research proposes a conceptualization of perceived values of local food shopping in SFSCs, divided into four key dimensions. Some dimensions are oriented on the food product itself (i.e. utilitarian dimension) and others are oriented around the shopping experience (i.e. social dimension). Finally, some dimensions are simultaneously food-oriented and shopping-oriented (i.e. hedonic and civic dimensions). Furthermore, this research takes a critical look at the “technological optimism” prevalent in the literature on retailing. By looking beyond the positive elements presented in the literature, this research advances understanding of the (in)compatibilities between local food consumption and the digitalization of SFSCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-10-2024-0548
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What (in)compatibilities between the local food shopping and digitalization of short food supply chains?

Fabien Rogeon
1 citations
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
2.07
article

What (in)compatibilities between the local food shopping and digitalization of short food supply chains?

Fabien Rogeon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Producers develop new digital technologies and services to retail their local foods. However, while digitalization of short food supply chains (SFSCs) is praised by producers, what do shoppers think? “Technological optimism” does not explain why technologies offered by producers are sometimes ignored, quickly abandoned or are the subject of consumer resistance. Consequently, this research explores (1) the perceived values of local food shopping in SFSCs and (2) the perceived benefits and drawbacks by local food shoppers regarding the digitization of SFSCs. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with 31 consumers who utilized digitalized short food supply chains for their local food shopping. The interviews conducted were fully recorded and transcribed; before that, a thematic content analysis was carried out by using NVivo software. Findings Results show the perceived values of local food shopping in SFSCs. These values are categorized into four key dimensions: utilitarian, hedonic, civism and social. Beyond developing an in-depth conceptualization of local food shopping, this research also shed light on the perceived benefits and drawbacks concerning digital technologies offered by producers. By confronting these positive and negative elements, three paradoxes of the digitalization of SFSCs emerge: a paradox of virtual information, a paradox of automated authenticity and a paradox of alienating freedom. Originality/value This research proposes a conceptualization of perceived values of local food shopping in SFSCs, divided into four key dimensions. Some dimensions are oriented on the food product itself (i.e. utilitarian dimension) and others are oriented around the shopping experience (i.e. social dimension). Finally, some dimensions are simultaneously food-oriented and shopping-oriented (i.e. hedonic and civic dimensions). Furthermore, this research takes a critical look at the “technological optimism” prevalent in the literature on retailing. By looking beyond the positive elements presented in the literature, this research advances understanding of the (in)compatibilities between local food consumption and the digitalization of SFSCs.

International Journal of Retail & Distribution ManagementVol. 53(6)
Excelia Business School (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.