Sampling complexity of quantum channel discrimination

Abstract In this paper, we study the problem of sampling complexity for channel discrimination with respect to two different strategies: product strategy and adaptive strategy. We first formally introduce the definitions of the sampling complexity of the channels under the framework of hypothesis testing , wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of samples needed to reach a desired error probability. We then establish the lower and upper bounds on the sampling complexity of the symmetric, asymmetric, and error exponent hypothesis testing settings. We show that, by imposing product strategy on testing, the bounds are always characterized by the generalized channel divergence, while with adaptive strategy, the bounds are characterized by the amortized channel divergence. Finally, we analyze two concrete examples, and obtain that the adaptive strategy can not lead to an advantage to the problem of determining the sampling complexity for classical-quantum channels, which can bring advantages for generalized amplitude damping channels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications in Theoretical Physics
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1572-9494/adcb9e
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sampling complexity of quantum channel discrimination

Lei Li
Communications in Theoretical Physics
Quantum Information and Cryptography
article

Sampling complexity of quantum channel discrimination

Lei Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we study the problem of sampling complexity for channel discrimination with respect to two different strategies: product strategy and adaptive strategy. We first formally introduce the definitions of the sampling complexity of the channels under the framework of hypothesis testing , wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of samples needed to reach a desired error probability. We then establish the lower and upper bounds on the sampling complexity of the symmetric, asymmetric, and error exponent hypothesis testing settings. We show that, by imposing product strategy on testing, the bounds are always characterized by the generalized channel divergence, while with adaptive strategy, the bounds are characterized by the amortized channel divergence. Finally, we analyze two concrete examples, and obtain that the adaptive strategy can not lead to an advantage to the problem of determining the sampling complexity for classical-quantum channels, which can bring advantages for generalized amplitude damping channels.

Communications in Theoretical PhysicsVol. 77(10)
Shanghai University (CN), China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Quantum Information and Cryptography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sampling complexity of quantum channel discrimination — Lei Li · Communications in Theoretical Physics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS